You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 61 No. 9, September 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (15)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Ethics
 •Coma/ Vegetative State
 •Diagnosis
 •Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Neurological Diagnosis Is More Than a State of Mind: Diagnostic Clarity and Impaired Consciousness

Arch Neurol. 2004;61:1354-1355.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The review by Kobylarz and Schiff in this issue of ARCHIVES points toward a future of greater diagnostic precision for states of impaired consciousness with eventual implications for prognosis and treatment of severe brain injury.1

Bringing additional clarity to the diagnostic process would seem to be an unimpeachable good. Knowledge, at least in Baconian science, has always been empowering and value-neutral. Unfortunately, improving our understanding of disorders of consciousness is a contentious area. One need only recall the highly publicized case of Terry Schiavo in Florida in which diagnostic distinctions were intentionally conflated by ideology to promote a political agenda.

In the Schiavo case, a family was divided against itself over the removal of artificial nutrition and hydration from a 39-year-old woman in the permanent vegetative state following anoxic brain injury in 1990.2 Her husband sought to remove her feeding tube, citing her prior wishes and the futility of . . . [Full Text of this Article]

THE ETHICAL OBLIGATIONS OF NEUROLOGISTS


CULTURAL REFLECTIONS AND NEUROLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS

THE RIGHT TO DIE AND THE RIGHT TO CARE

AUTHOR INFORMATION
Joseph J. Fins, MD; Fred Plum, MD


RELATED ARTICLE

Functional Imaging of Severely Brain-Injured Patients: Progress, Challenges, and Limitations
Erik J. Kobylarz and Nicholas D. Schiff
Arch Neurol. 2004;61(9):1357-1360.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Minimally Conscious State: A Diagnosis in Search of an Epidemiology
Fins et al.
Arch Neurol 2007;64:1400-1405.
FULL TEXT  

Late recovery from the minimally conscious state: Ethical and policy implications
Fins et al.
Neurology 2007;68:304-307.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The portrayal of coma in contemporary motion pictures.
Fins et al.
Neurology 2007;68:79-80.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.