You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 58 No. 8, August 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Book Reviews
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disorders (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol 883)

edited by Michael E. Shy, John Kamholz, and Robert E. Lovelace, 460 pp, with illus, $150, ISBN 1-57331-182-0, New York, NY, New York Academy of Sciences, 1999.

Arch Neurol. 2001;58:1307.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The third international conference on Charcot-Marie-Tooth disorders was held in October 1998, and the proceedings were published in 1999. Unlike many such compendia, this book is a gem, especially for anyone with a serious interest in neuromuscular disorders; it is the best single source of modern information on hereditary neuropathies available.

The organizers brought together most of the known authorities in the clinical, cellular, and molecular biological science of these conditions. The contributors, in turn, have written concise but thorough reviews of their fields so that the clinical features in man, phenotype/genotype correlations, the biology of myelin proteins and their role in pathogenesis, Schwann cell and axonal interactions, and natural and genetically engineered animal models are all discussed in depth. The quality of the chapters is of such a high order that it is difficult to single out any author. However, the editors, perhaps inadvertently, included 2 almost identical versions . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.