 |
 |

Whiplash
Vladimir Hachinski, MD, DSc
Arch Neurol. 2000;57:594.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
FEW CONDITIONS rouse emotions as quickly as a discussion of whiplash, and yet plausible explanations for the phenomenon are slowly beginning to emerge.
Bogduk and Teasell point out that after acute injury most patients recover rapidly, 80% being asymptomatic by 1 year, 15% to 20% remaining symptomatic, 5% severely so. This is in keeping with Berry's observation that drivers of demolition derbies seldom experience chronic symptoms or disability, despite thousands of collisions. The contributors differ in their explanations for chronic symptoms. Bogduk and Teasell state that those with chronic symptoms are likely to have a substantive injury, whereas Berry points out that too often a simplistic physical explanation is sought for this multifaceted condition. Bogduk and Teasell refer to a study in which psychological distress was relieved when the pain was. If the pain recurred, the psychological distress reappeared, but if the pain was removed, once . . . [Full Text of this Article]
London, Ontario
RELATED ARTICLES
Whiplash: The Evidence for an Organic Etiology
Nikolai Bogduk and Robert Teasell
Arch Neurol. 2000;57(4):590-591.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Chronic Whiplash Syndrome as a Functional Disorder
Henry Berry
Arch Neurol. 2000;57(4):592-594.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
An active exercise and posture protocol reduced pain in acute whiplash injuries
Hawkins
Evid. Based Med. 2001;6:76-76.
FULL TEXT
Comment on Berry and Hachinski
Ferrari and Berry
Arch Neurol 2000;57:1791-1792.
FULL TEXT
|