You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 57 No. 1, January 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Special Millennium Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?


A Century and a Half of Modern Neurology, a Decade of the Brain, and the Millennium

Lewis P. Rowland, MD

Arch Neurol. 2000;57:52.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Roger Rosenberg, MD, asked us to outline the greatest triumphs of the century and important research that needs to be addressed. Can we tell?

I started neurology training in 1950. Some of the then-current technologies disappeared unpredictably, such as pneumoencephalography, direct carotid injections for angiography, frontal lobotomy, fever therapy, and tank respirators. In addition, diseases, such as paralytic poliomyelitis, measles encephalitis, Reye syndrome, and neurosyphilis, disappeared.

New technologies came unpredictably, such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, interventional neuroradiology, stereotaxic brain surgery, microsurgery, neurointensive care, positive pressure respirators, and antibiotics, arrived unpredictably. Effective drug therapy for previously untreatable diseases replaced the practice pattern Labe Scheinberg, MD, labeled ADiagnose and Adios@.

Unpredicted wonders of basic science included the DNA code and molecular genetics, which contributed to clinical research. Reciprocally, investigation of human disease contributed to basic science, for example, prions and prion diseases, triplet repeats, positional cloning, . . . [Full Text of this Article]

From the Neurological Institute, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, NY.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.