You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 56 No. 9, September 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Controversies in Neurology
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (13)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Thrombolysis
 •Cerebrovascular Disease
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Is There Still a Role for Intravenous Heparin in Acute Stroke?

No

Peter Sandercock, MA, DM, FRCPE
From the Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland.

Arch Neurol. 1999;56:1160-1162.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

THERE IS NO evidence to support the routine use of intravenous (IV) heparin in the treatment of any type of patient with acute ischemic stroke. The first randomized trial, undertaken by the Cerebral Embolism Study Group, stopped prematurely when there was a nonsignificant trend in favor of treatment, after only 45 (of a planned 140) patients with presumed cardioembolic stroke had been randomized.1 Three years later, a randomized trial in 225 patients showed that there was no evidence of benefit from IV heparin in preventing stroke progression.2 A quantitative systematic review of the data from these 2 trials also did not provide any evidence of net benefit.3

Despite the lack of evidence,4 IV heparin has—ever since heparin became available—been used extensively (in some centers, at least) in patients with acute stroke for a variety of reasons: to prevent early recurrence in suspected cardioembolic stroke; to . . . [Full Text of this Article]


RELATED ARTICLES

Is There Still a Role for Intravenous Heparin in Acute Stroke?: Yes
Armin J. Grau and Werner Hacke
Arch Neurol. 1999;56(9):1159-1160.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Intravenous Heparin in Acute Stroke
Vladimir Hachinski
Arch Neurol. 1999;56(9):1162.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy for Ischemic Stroke: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)
Albers et al.
Chest 2008;133:630S-669S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Determinants of IV heparin treatment in patients with ischemic stroke
Schmidt et al.
Neurology 2004;63:2407-2409.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy for Ischemic Stroke: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy
Albers et al.
Chest 2004;126:483S-512S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

"Computed Tomography-Negative" Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Case Report and Implications for Management
Packard et al.
Arch Neurol 2003;60:1156-1159.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Case 21-2003 - A 72-Year-Old Man with Repetitive Strokes in the Posterior Circulation
Ronthal et al.
NEJM 2003;349:170-180.
FULL TEXT  

Considering the Role of Heparin and Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Moonis and Fisher
Stroke 2002;33:1927-1933.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke
Brott and Bogousslavsky
NEJM 2000;343:710-722.
FULL TEXT  

More on Heparin in Stroke
JWatch General 1999;1999:2-2.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.