You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 56 No. 9, September 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Thrombolysis
 •Cerebrovascular Disease
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Arrhythmias
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

When Should Heparin Be Given to Patients With Atrial Fibrillation–Related Embolic Brain Infarcts?

Arch Neurol. 1999;56:1059-1060.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

THE APPROPRIATE use of heparin continues to be one of the most contentious and controversial issues in the fields of neurology and medicine. The introduction of fractionated low-molecular-weight heparin and heparinoids has further complicated the issue for clinicians. Although these newer compounds have theoretical and practical advantages, most clinicians have had little experience with them, and few data are available to guide rational choice between different pharmaceutical products. Clinicians ask, "Which product should be given to which patients, by what route, with or without an initial bolus, at what dose, monitored how, and when should the treatment be started?"

In this edition of the ARCHIVES, Chamorro et al1 address the question of when to administer heparin. The great majority of clinicians would agree that the group of patients that they chose to treat with anticoagulants—patients with atrial fibrillation who have an embolic stroke—was appropriate. Many randomized trials have shown that . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Heparin in Acute Stroke With Atrial Fibrillation: Clinical Relevance of Very Early Treatment
Angel Chamorro, Nicolas Vila, Carlos Ascaso, and Rosa Blanc
Arch Neurol. 1999;56(9):1098-1102.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Considering the Role of Heparin and Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Moonis and Fisher
Stroke 2002;33:1927-1933.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Secondary Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation : Lessons From Clinical Practice
Evans et al.
Stroke 2000;31:2106-2111.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

More on Heparin in Stroke
JWatch General 1999;1999:2-2.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.