You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 56 No. 1, January 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Letters to the Editor
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on ISI (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Methodological Pitfalls in Evaluating Clinical Tests

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Over the last few years the ARCHIVES has published a number of articles on the screening or diagnosis of dementia. The most recent one appeared in the March 1998 issue titled: "A 7 Minute Neurocognitive Screening Battery Highly Sensitive to Alzheimer's Disease."1 Interest in this topic is high among clinicians, researchers, and the general public. In fact, this article first came to our attention because it was reported in an Australian daily newspaper before the journal was available locally.

Our concern is not with the nature of the test battery constructed by Solomon and colleagues.1 By all accounts their choice of tests is a rational, empirically based one, offering many advantages over currently widely used tests. Rather, we are concerned at the description of the test as being diagnostic, and by the research design used to establish the battery's performance.

By its very nature, a design in which a group . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.