 |
 |

Clinical Neuromythology and Other Arguments and Essays, Pertinent and Impertinent
by William M. Landau, MD, 556 pp, Armonk, NY, Futura Publishing Co, 1998.
Arch Neurol. 1999;56:122.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
On a huge hill,
Cragged, and steep, Truth stands, and hee that will
Reach her, about must, and about must goe;
And what the hills suddennes resists,
winne so; Yet strive so, that before age,
deaths twilight, Thy Soule rest, for
none can worke in that night.John Donne
This collection of analytic commentaries from highly regarded medical journals bluntly attacks and sharply critiques publications that lack, or claim without justification, scientific credibility based on data that have been an affront to the author's sensibilities. The author's comments remind one of Socrates' role as gadfly of Athensstinging its citizens for transgressing his criteria of a reasoned pursuit of truth.
A unique feature of most sections is that, having reprinted Landau's original barbs, the rebuttals of the original authors, coauthors, or other interested parties have also been reprinted followed by Landau's responses which are often as brief and pithy as his . . . [Full Text of this Article]
|