You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 66 No. 9, September 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Neurological Review
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (10)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Neurology
 •Cerebrovascular Disease
 •Stroke
 •Rehabilitation Medicine
 •Review
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Robotic Devices as Therapeutic and Diagnostic Tools for Stroke Recovery

Bruce T. Volpe, MD; Patricio T. Huerta, PhD; Johanna L. Zipse, BA; Avrielle Rykman, OTR; Dylan Edwards, PhD; Laura Dipietro, PhD; Neville Hogan, PhD; Hermano I. Krebs, PhD

Arch Neurol. 2009;66(9):1086-1090.

The understanding that recovery of brain function after stroke is imperfect has prompted decades of effort to engender speedier and better recovery through environmental manipulation. Clinical evidence has shown that the performance plateau exhibited by patients with chronic stroke, usually signaling an end of standard rehabilitation, might represent a period of consolidation rather than a performance optimum. These results highlight the difficulty of translating pertinent neurological data into pragmatic changes in clinical programs. This opinion piece focuses on upper limb impairment reduction after robotic training. We propose that robotic devices be considered as novel tools that might be used alone or in combination with novel pharmacology and other bioengineered devices. Additionally, robotic devices can measure motor performance objectively and will contribute to a detailed phenotype of stroke recovery.


Author Affiliations: Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, Burke-Cornell Medical Research Institute, White Plains, New York (Drs Volpe, Huerta, and Edwards and Mss Zipse and Rykman); and Newman Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering (Drs Dipietro, Hogan, and Krebs), and Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences (Dr Hogan), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge. Ms Zipse is currently with MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, Massachusetts.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

This Month in Archives of Neurology
Arch Neurol. 2009;66(9):1056-1057.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Stroke Rehabilitation 2009: Old Chestnuts and New Insights
Kalra
Stroke 2010;41:e88-e90.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.