You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 66 No. 4, April 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Neurology
 •Deep Brain Stimulation
 •Movement Disorders
 •Neuromuscular diseases
 •Surgery
 •Neurosurgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Deep Brain Stimulation for Primary Generalized Dystonia

Long-term Outcomes

Ioannis U. Isaias, MD; Ron L. Alterman, MD; Michele Tagliati, MD

Arch Neurol. 2009;66(4):465-470.

Background  Pallidal deep brain stimulation (DBS) is the best therapeutic option for patients with disabling primary generalized dystonia (PGD) that is refractory to medications. However, little is known about its long-term effects.

Objective  To describe long-term clinical outcomes in patients with PGD who underwent pallidal DBS.

Design  Case series.

Setting  University hospital.

Patients  Thirty consecutive patients with at least 2 years' follow-up after pallidal DBS for intractable PGD.

Interventions  Pallidal DBS and annual follow-up examinations up to 8 years after DBS implantation.

Main Outcome Measures  Clinical outcome as measured by changes in the Burke-Fahn-Marsden dystonia scale, incidence and prevalence of adverse events, total electrical energy delivered, and implantable pulse generator longevity.

Results  Twenty-three patients were followed for 3 years, 13 for 4 years, 9 for 5 years, 5 for 6 years, 5 for 7 years, and 1 for 8 years after DBS. Overall improvement at 1 year was maintained in all at successive yearly examinations. There were no intraoperative complications; hardware-related adverse events were infrequent. Rare stimulation-related adverse events primarily affected speech. Implantable pulse generators were replaced every 24 months on average in patients who received initial stimulation at 130-Hz frequency. No battery was replaced, for up to 48 months, in 20 patients initially stimulated using 60 Hz. Clinical outcome did not depend on high energies of stimulation.

Conclusions  Pallidal DBS is a safe and effective treatment for PGD, with improvement sustained for up to 8 years in 1 patient. Low energies of stimulation, although they did not affect clinical outcome, were associated with longer battery life.


Author Affiliations: Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York (Drs Isaias, Alterman, and Tagliati); and Department of Neurology, Università di Milano Bicocca, Milano, Italy (Dr Isaias).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

This Month in Archives of Neurology
Arch Neurol. 2009;66(4):431-432.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Deep Brain Stimulation for Primary Generalized Dystonia
JWatch Neurology 2009;2009:1-1.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.