You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 65 No. 9, September 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Multiple Sclerosis/ Demyelinating Disease
 •Ophthalmology
 •Retinal/ Chorioretinal Disorders
 •Ophthalmological Disorders, Other
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Immunologic Disorders
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Reproducibility of Optical Coherence Tomography in Multiple Sclerosis

Deanna Cettomai, BS; Mathew Pulicken, MBBS, MHS; Eliza Gordon-Lipkin, BS; Amber Salter, MPH; Teresa C. Frohman, BA; Amy Conger, BA; Xiao Zhang, PhD; Gary Cutter, PhD; Laura J. Balcer, MD, MSCE; Elliot M. Frohman, MD, PhD; Peter A. Calabresi, MD

Arch Neurol. 2008;65(9):1218-1222.

Background  Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a promising new method of quantifying axon thickness in the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) that has been used predominantly by ophthalmologists to monitor glaucoma. Optical coherence tomography is being considered as a potential outcome measure in multiple sclerosis (MS) clinical trials, but no data exist on the reproducibility of this technique in MS centers.

Objective  To determine the reproducibility of OCT measurement of mean RNFL thickness in the undilated eyes of healthy control subjects and patients with MS.

Design  Prospective analysis of 4 healthy controls to determine interrater, intrarater, and longitudinal reproducibility. Cross-sectional analysis of 3 cohorts of patients with MS (n = 396) and healthy controls (n = 153).

Setting  Multiple sclerosis clinics at 3 academic medical centers.

Patients or Other Participants  Healthy controls and patients with MS.

Main Outcome Measure  Thickness of RNFL.

Results  We found excellent agreement with respect to interrater (intraclass correlation [ICC], 0.89), intrarater (ICC, 0.98), and intervisit (ICC, 0.91) results. Mean RNFL thickness did not vary significantly among research centers for patients with MS (93, 92, and 90 µm) or among healthy controls (103, 105, and 104 µm) by site.

Conclusions  We demonstrate that mean RNFL thickness can be reproducibly measured by trained technicians in an MS center using the OCT-3 model. The RNFL measures from cohorts of age-matched controls and patients with MS from 3 different research centers were remarkably similar.


Author Affiliations: Department of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (Mss Cettomai and Gordon-Lipkin and Drs Pulicken and Calabresi); Departments of Neurology and Ophthalmology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (Mss Salter, Frohman, and Conger and Dr Frohman); Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama, Birmingham (Drs Zhang and Cutter); and Departments of Neurology and Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia (Dr Balcer).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

This Month in Archives of Neurology
Arch Neurol. 2008;65(9):1152-1153.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Macular Volume Determined by Optical Coherence Tomography as a Measure of Neuronal Loss in Multiple Sclerosis
Burkholder et al.
Arch Neurol 2009;66:1366-1372.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.