 |
|
Thrombolysis in Patients With Marked Clinical Fluctuations in Neurologic Status Due to Cerebral Ischemia
Ozcan Ozdemir, MD;
Vadim Beletsky, MD, PhD;
Richard Chan, MD, FRCP(Edin), FRCP;
Vladimir Hachinski, MD, FRCPC, DSc
Arch Neurol. 2008;65(8):1041-1043.
Background It is unclear whether thrombolysis benefits patients with fluctuating neurologic symptoms.
Objective To evaluate the clinical course of patients with acute stroke who presented with marked fluctuations in neurologic status and received thrombolytic therapy.
Design Prospective analysis.
Setting London Health Science Centre University Hospital, London.
Patients We prospectively identified patients who were treated with intravenous or intra-arterial recombinant tissue plasminogen activator between January 1, 2004, and January 1, 2006. For this analysis, we chose patients who had marked fluctuation in neurologic status at presentation and who received thrombolytic therapy.
Main Outcome Measure Fluctuation of neurologic deficits, defined as a 4-point or greater increase or decrease in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score.
Results Among 127 patients, 13 (10.2%) had clinical fluctuations. Patients with fluctuations presented with a lower NIHSS score (median, 7; interquartile range, 10-17) compared with patients without fluctuations (median, 12; interquartile range, 10-17) (P < .001). Fluctuation of symptoms or signs ceased after thrombolysis. At 24 hours after stroke, the median NIHSS score was 2 (range, 1-12). All patients had favorable neurologic and functional outcomes at 3 months after thrombolysis (modified Rankin scale score, 0-2).
Conclusion Thrombolysis may benefit patients with fluctuating symptoms or signs due to cerebral ischemia.
Author Affiliations: London Health Science Centre and Department of Neurological Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
RELATED ARTICLES
This Month in Archives of Neurology
Arch Neurol. 2008;65(8):1013-1014.
FULL TEXT
Thrombolysis, Fluctuations, Trials, and Such
Louis R. Caplan
Arch Neurol. 2008;65(8):1017-1019.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|
