You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 63 No. 4, April 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
 •Neuromuscular diseases
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Can Selection of Rapidly Progressing Patients Shorten Clinical Trials in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis?

Mamede de Carvalho, MD; Michael Swash, MD

Arch Neurol. 2006;63:557-560.

Background  The marked variability in progression of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) requires large numbers of patients to detect a significant effect in current clinical trial designs.

Objective  To test the utility of a lead-in period to assess rate of progression so that patients with rapidly progressive ALS can be selected for subsequent clinical trials.

Design  Prospective study.

Setting  The ALS Center, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.

Patients  Fifty-seven consecutively recruited patients assessed at diagnosis and 3 months later (end of lead-in period).

Interventions  Change in ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALS-FRS) score was analyzed to establish a statistically significant cutoff point to define patients with rapid (group 1) or slow (group 2) progression. Patients from both groups were reexamined 1 and 3 months after the lead-in period.

Main Outcome Measures  Changes in ALS-FRS score, motor unit number estimation, and neurophysiologic index, and resultant grouping of patients according to rate of progression at 1 and 3 months.

Results  Both the 80th percentile and 2 SDs above the mean of the change in ALS-FRS score identified the same patients. Twelve patients showed rapid progression (group 1) and 45 showed slow progression (group 2). One month after the lead-in period there was a significant reduction in ALS-FRS score, motor unit number estimation, and neurophysiologic index in group 1, and after 3 months all these measurements changed significantly in both groups.

Conclusions  This strategy of selecting patients with rapidly progressing ALS for inclusion in exploratory, short phase II clinical trials offers substantial savings in costs and time, and could accelerate the process of testing potentially useful drugs for the treatment of ALS.


Author Affiliations: Department of Neurology, Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal (Dr de Carvalho); Institute of Neuroscience, Queen Mary School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, England (Dr Swash); Laboratory of Electromyography, Centro de Estudos Egas Moniz, Lisbon (Dr de Carvalho); Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Lisbon (Dr de Carvalho); and Department of Neurology, Royal London Hospital (Dr Swash).







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.