This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Correction  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (9)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related letters  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Neuromuscular diseases  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Carlo Colosimo, MD; Matteo Bologna, MD; Simona Lamberti, MD; Lucio Avanzino, MD; Laura Marinelli, MD; Giovanni Fabbrini, MD; Giovanni Abbruzzese, MD; Giovanni Defazio, MD; Alfredo Berardelli, MD

Arch Neurol. 2006;63:441-444.

Background  Hemifacial spasm (HFS) is a common movement disorder.

Objective  To evaluate possible differences in the demographic and clinical features between primary and secondary HFS.

Design  In-person interview using a standardized questionnaire to collect demographic and clinical data.

Setting  A multicenter study that included patients with HFS attending 3 Italian academic centers.

Patients  Two hundred fourteen patients with HFS.

Main Outcome Measure  A complete neurological examination assessed the current muscle distribution of spasm and the presence of synkinetic movements between upper and lower facial muscles.

Results  The study sample comprised 214 patients with HFS, 81 men and 133 women, having a mean ± SD age of 65.9 ± 12.3 years; 164 patients were classified as having primary HFS and 50 patients (48 postparalytic and 2 symptomatic cases) were classified as having secondary HFS. Patients with primary and those with secondary HFS had similar mean ± SD ages at onset (54.9 ± 13.5 vs 57.0 ± 12.8 years), male-female ratios (63:101 vs 18:32), right-sided–left-sided HFS (77:86 [1 bilateral] vs 21:28 [1 bilateral]), and frequencies of familial cases (2.9% vs 2.0%), respectively. Most patients (65.0%) with primary HFS had initial symptoms of periocular muscle contractions alone and had subsequent involvement of the lower facial muscles. Most patients (72.0%) with secondary HFS reported initial involvement of the upper and lower facial muscles simultaneously. Signs of synkinesis were present in primary (43.3%) and secondary (58.0%) HFS.

Conclusions  Patients with primary and those with secondary HFS share common demographic and clinical features, including sex distribution, age at onset, affected side of HFS, synkinesis, and rarity of familial cases. Signs of synkinesis were present in significant proportions of patients with primary or secondary HFS. The 2 forms differed in clinical presentation.

Author Affiliations: Department of Neurosciences and Neuromed Institute, University of Rome "La Sapienza," Rome (Drs Colosimo, Bologna, Fabbrini, and Berardelli); Department of Neurological and Psychiatric Sciences, University of Bari, Bari (Drs Lamberti and Defazio); and Department of Neurosciences and Vision, University of Genoa, Genoa (Drs Avanzino, Marinelli, and Abbruzzese), Italy.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Primary vs Postparalytic Hemifacial Spasm
Eng-King Tan and Ling-Ling Chan
Arch Neurol. 2006;63(8):1204.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Primary vs Postparalytic Hemifacial Spasm—Reply
Carlo Colosimo, Matteo Bologna, Simona Lamberti, Laura Avanzino, Lucio Marinelli, Giovanni Fabbrini, Giovanni Abbruzzese, Giovanni Defazio, and Alfredo Berardelli
Arch Neurol. 2006;63(8):1204.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Tactile temporal discrimination in patients with blepharospasm
Fiorio et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2008;79:796-798.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Primary vs Postparalytic Hemifacial Spasm.
Tan and Chan
Arch Neurol 2006;63:1204-1204.
FULL TEXT