You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 63 No. 12, December 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Brain Cancer
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Clinical Implications of Status Epilepticus in Patients With Neoplasms

Robert Cavaliere, MD; Elana Farace, PhD; David Schiff, MD

Arch Neurol. 2006;63:1746-1749.

Objectives  To elucidate factors that contribute to the development of status epilepticus (SE) and determine prognostic factors and the impact on 30-day survival.

Design  Retrospective review of medical records.

Setting  University of Virginia Health System.

Patients  Thirty-five patients with SE secondary to a tumor, either primary or systemic, or its treatment.

Main Outcome Measures  Seizure control, 30-day mortality, and overall survival.

Results  Status epilepticus most commonly occurred at tumor presentation or progression and was controlled in all cases. Thirty-day mortality was 23%. Patients with systemic cancer were at higher risk of death, although they were older and had more acute comorbidities. Age, tumor type, status of tumor at time of event, history of epilepsy, and status type were not predictive of mortality. Age was associated with a higher rate of nursing home placement and shorter overall survival. Overall survival was determined by underlying tumor.

Conclusions  Status epilepticus in patients with cancer is responsive to therapy. Workup of underlying causes is indicated, even in the presence of subtherapeutic antiepileptic drug levels, because coexistent conditions contributing to the development of SE may be present. In those with known cancer, brain imaging should be performed because SE usually occurs in the setting of tumor progression or new metastases.


Author Affiliations: Department of Neurology, Ohio State University, Columbus (Dr Cavaliere); Department of Neurosurgery, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey (Dr Farace); and Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville (Dr Schiff).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Status Epilepticus in Patients With CNS Metastases
Svetlana Blitshteyn and Kurt A. Jaeckle
Arch Neurol. 2007;64(6):916.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Status Epilepticus in Patients With CNS Metastases—Reply
David Schiff and Robert Cavaliere
Arch Neurol. 2007;64(6):916-917.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Status Epilepticus in Patients With CNS Metastases
Blitshteyn and Jaeckle
Arch Neurol 2007;64:916-916.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.