You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 63 No. 11, November 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Radiologic Imaging
 •Dementias
 •Neurology, Other
 •Magnetic Resonance Imaging
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Progression in Frontotemporal Dementia

Identifying a Benign Behavioral Variant by Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Rhys R. Davies, MRCP; Christopher M. Kipps, FRACP; Joanna Mitchell, BSc; Jillian J. Kril, PhD; Glenda M. Halliday, PhD; John R. Hodges, FMedSci

Arch Neurol. 2006;63:1627-1631.

Objective  To assess the clinical course and prognosis in patients with behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia (FTD) lacking evidence of brain atrophy on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Design  Patients were enrolled into this prospective cohort study over a period of 15 years; cognitive status, duration of symptoms, and behavioral indexes were recorded. Brain MRIs were rated using a standardized scale.

Setting  Regional early-onset dementia clinic.

Participants  Thirty-one participants diagnosed clinically with behavioral-variant FTD.

Intervention  Rating of MRIs.

Main Outcome Measures  Death or institutionalization after a minimum of 3 years' follow-up indicated poor prognosis, while the ability to live independently was regarded as a good prognosis for the purpose of survival (Kaplan-Meier) and discriminant function analysis.

Results  Patients with normal or borderline MRI findings (n = 15) showed significantly longer survival to institutionalization or death than those (n = 16) with definite frontotemporal atrophy (mean ± SE, 9.3 ± 1.7 years vs 3.0 ± 0.7 years; P<.01). Using groups defined by 3-year outcome (good or bad prognosis), cerebral atrophy predicted poor outcome while age, symptom duration, cognitive performance, behavioral impairment, and overall disability at baseline did not.

Conclusions  Patients with FTD with normal MRI results follow a more benign course than cases with atrophy at presentation. The substrate of the behavioral symptoms in such cases may differ from the neurodegenerative pathological features typically associated with FTD.


Author Affiliations: Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital (Drs Davies, Kipps, and Hodges and Ms Mitchell), and MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (Dr Hodges), Cambridge, England; Centre for Education and Research on Ageing, University of Sydney (Dr Kril), and Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute, University of New South Wales (Dr Halliday), Sydney, Australia.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Measuring progression in frontotemporal dementia: Implications for therapeutic interventions
Kipps et al.
Neurology 2008;70:2046-2052.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Frontal Paralimbic Network Atrophy in Very Mild Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia
Seeley et al.
Arch Neurol 2008;65:249-255.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Role of imaging techniques in the diagnosis of dementia
O'BRIEN
Br. J. Radiol. 2007;80:S71-S77.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.