 |
 |

Visual Assessment of Atrophy on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Pathologically Confirmed Young-Onset Dementias
Marcus Likeman, FRCR;
Valerie M. Anderson, BSc;
John M. Stevens, DRACR, FRCR;
Adam D. Waldman, PhD, MRCP, FRCR;
Alison K. Godbolt, MA, MRCP;
Chris Frost, MA, DipStat;
Martin N. Rossor, MD, FRCP;
Nick C. Fox, MD, FRCP
Arch Neurol. 2005;62:1410-1415.
Objectives To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of visual inspection of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a range of pathologically confirmed diseases causing young-onset dementia and to assess the sensitivity and specificity of atrophy patterns for Alzheimer disease (AD) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD).
Design Sixty-two patients with pathologically confirmed diseases that may present as young-onset dementia were selected from a biopsy and postmortem series. The first diagnostic T1-weighted volumetric MRI was obtained for each patient, together with images from 22 healthy control subjects. All MRIs were assessed for regional atrophy independently by 3 neuroradiologists, blinded to all clinical details except age. Observers were also asked to use their clinical judgment to form a diagnosis.
Results Eighty-seven percent of dementia cases were distinguished from controls after visual inspection of MRI, and a correct pathologically confirmed diagnosis was given in 58% of cases. Hippocampal atrophy was noted in 92% of AD cases but was commonly seen in other dementias and controls. A bilateral symmetrical pattern of hippocampal atrophy discriminated AD from FTLD with 47% specificity, while posterior greater than anterior gradient of atrophy was 92% specific for AD. Atrophy of the anterior, inferior, and lateral temporal lobes was suggestive of FTLD pathology ( 90% sensitivity), while anterior greater than posterior gradient of atrophy and hemispheric asymmetry of atrophy were each at least 85% specific for FTLD.
Conclusion Despite variation and overlap of atrophy patterns, visual inspection of regional atrophy on MRI may aid in discriminating AD and FTLD.
Author Affiliations: National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (Drs Likeman and Rossor); Dementia Research Centre, Institute of Neurology (Ms Anderson, Drs Waldman, Godbolt, and Fox, and Mr Frost), and Department of Radiology (Dr Stevens); Department of Imaging, Charing Cross Hospital (Dr Waldman); Medical Statistics Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (Mr Frost); and Division of Neuroscience and Psychological Medicine, Imperial College (Dr Rossor); London, England.
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Medial temporal lobe atrophy on MRI scans and the diagnosis of Alzheimer disease
Duara et al.
Neurology 2008;71:1986-1992.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Distinct MRI Atrophy Patterns in Autopsy-Proven Alzheimer's Disease and Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration
Rabinovici et al.
AM J ALZHEIMERS DIS OTHER DEMEN 2008;22:474-488.
ABSTRACT
The significance of medial temporal lobe atrophy: A postmortem MRI study in the very old
Barkhof et al.
Neurology 2007;69:1521-1527.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Focal cortical presentations of Alzheimer's disease
Alladi et al.
Brain 2007;130:2636-2645.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Neuropsychological deficits in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease: a meta-analytic review
Hutchinson and Mathias
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2007;78:917-928.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Different regional patterns of cortical thinning in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia
Du et al.
Brain 2007;130:1159-1166.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|