You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 62 No. 3, March 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (23)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Cerebrovascular Disease
 •Stroke
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Efficacy of Aspirin Plus Extended-Release Dipyridamole in Preventing Recurrent Stroke in High-Risk Populations

Ralph L. Sacco, MS, MD; Juhani Sivenius, MD, PhD; Hans-Christoph Diener, MD, PhD

Arch Neurol. 2005;62:403-408.

Objective  To assess the efficacy of aspirin plus extended-release dipyridamole compared with aspirin alone for the prevention of recurrent stroke among high-risk groups.

Design  A post hoc analysis was conducted using data from the European Stroke Prevention Study 2. Rates of annual strokes and vascular events were determined for the aspirin plus extended-release dipyridamole group (n = 1650) and the aspirin-only group (n = 1649), and were stratified by risk subgroup and univariate risk factors. Stroke models from the Framingham Study and the Stroke Prognostic Instrument II were applied to subjects in the European Stroke Prevention Study 2 to categorize patients into risk groups.

Results  Compared with aspirin alone, aspirin plus extended-release dipyridamole demonstrated a more pronounced efficacy in reducing the risk for stroke and vascular events among patients younger than 70 years; those with hypertension, prior stroke, or transient ischemic attack; current smokers; and those with any prior cardiovascular disease. Relative hazard reductions favored the combination of aspirin plus extended-release dipyridamole, and were greatest for the high-risk Framingham Study group and the moderate-risk Stroke Prognostic Instrument II subgroup.

Conclusion  Aspirin plus extended-release dipyridamole is more effective than aspirin alone at preventing stroke, and the difference in efficacy increases in higher-risk patients.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Neurology and Epidemiology, College of Physicians and Surgeons and the Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, Neurological Institute, New York, NY (Dr Sacco); Department of Neuroscience and Neurology, Kuopio University Hospital, Brain Research and Rehabilitation Center Neuron, Kuopio, Finland (Dr Sivenius); and Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (Dr Diener).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Dipyridamole plus aspirin versus aspirin alone in secondary prevention after TIA or stroke: a meta-analysis by risk
Halkes et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2008;79:1218-1223.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Antiplatelet medication management in patients hospitalized with ischemic stroke
Nickman et al.
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2007;64:2250-2256.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Results of the Management of Atherothrombosis With Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients Trial: Implications for the Neurologist
Fisher
Arch Neurol 2006;63:20-24.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Long-Term Therapy to Prevent Stroke
Kirshner et al.
J Am Board Fam Med 2005;18:528-540.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Role of Adenosine and Nitric Oxide on the Mechanisms of Action of Dipyridamole
Gamboa et al.
Stroke 2005;36:2170-2175.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.