You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 61 No. 6, June 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (10)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Genetic Counseling/ Testing/ Therapy
 •Ataxia
 •Neurogenetics
 •Neuromuscular diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Impact of Presymptomatic Genetic Testing for Hereditary Ataxia and Neuromuscular Disorders

Corrine O. Smith, MS; Hillary P. Lipe, ARNP; Thomas D. Bird, MD

Arch Neurol. 2004;61:875-880.

Background  With the exception of Huntington disease, the psychological and psychosocial impact of DNA testing for neurogenetic disorders has not been well studied.

Objective  To evaluate the psychosocial impact of genetic testing for autosomal dominant forms of hereditary ataxia and neuromuscular disorders.

Patients  Fifty subjects at risk for autosomal dominant forms of spinocerebellar ataxia (n = 11), muscular dystrophy (n = 28), and hereditary neuropathy (n = 12).

Design and Setting  A prospective, descriptive, observational study in a university setting of individuals who underwent genetic counseling and DNA testing. Participants completed 3 questionnaires before testing and at regular intervals after testing. The questionnaire set included the Revised Impact of Event Scale, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, demographic information, and an assessment of attitudes and feelings about genetic testing.

Results  Thirty-nine subjects (78%) completed 6 months to 5 years of posttest follow-up. Common reasons for pursuing genetic testing were to provide an explanation for symptoms, emotional relief, and information for future planning. Thirty-four (68%) had positive and 16 (32%) had negative genetic results. In those with a positive result, 26 (76%) had nonspecific signs or symptoms of the relevant disorder. Forty-two participants (84%) felt genetic testing was beneficial. Groups with positive and negative test results coped well with results. However, 13 subjects (10 with positive and 3 with negative results) reported elevated anxiety levels, and 3 (1 with positive and 2 with negative results) expressed feelings of depression during the follow-up period. The test result was not predictive of anxiety or depression.

Conclusions  Most individuals find neurogenetic testing to be beneficial, regardless of the result. Anxiety or depression may persist in some persons with positive or negative test results. Testing can have a demonstrable impact on family planning and interpersonal relationships. Further studies are needed to assess the long-term impact of such testing.


From the Departments of Neurology and Medicine (Ms Smith and Dr Bird), University of Washington, Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (Ms Lipe), and the Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle. Dr Bird is a member of the Speaker's Bureau for Athena Diagnostics, Inc.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Disclosing Individual Results of Clinical Research: Implications of Respect for Participants
Shalowitz and Miller
JAMA 2005;294:737-740.
FULL TEXT  

Psychosocial Impact of Screening for Intracranial Aneurysms in Relatives With Familial Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Wermer et al.
Stroke 2005;36:836-840.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of Presymptomatic Genetic Testing for Hereditary Ataxia and Neuromuscular Disorders: Where is the Evidence?
Janssens
Arch Neurol 2005;62:164-164.
FULL TEXT  

Impact of Presymptomatic Genetic Testing for Hereditary Ataxia and Neuromuscular Disorders: Where is the Evidence?--Reply
Smith et al.
Arch Neurol 2005;62:164-164.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.