You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 61 No. 2, February 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (6)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Multiple Sclerosis/ Demyelinating Disease
 •Diagnosis
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Immunologic Disorders
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Specificity of Barkhof Criteria in Predicting Conversion to Multiple Sclerosis When Applied to Clinically Isolated Brainstem Syndromes

Jaume Sastre-Garriga, MD; Mar Tintoré, MD, PhD; Alex Rovira, MD, PhD; Carlos Nos, MD; Jordi Río, MD, PhD; Alan J. Thompson, MD; Xavier Montalban, MD, PhD

Arch Neurol. 2004;61:222-224.

Background  Barkhof criteria have been adopted to demonstrate dissemination in space in the new multiple sclerosis diagnostic criteria because of their high specificity for predicting conversion to multiple sclerosis. One of the 4 Barkhof criteria is the presence of an infratentorial lesion. In clinically isolated syndromes (CIS) of the brainstem (CISB), the infratentorial criterion does not demonstrate dissemination in space, raising the possibility that the criteria may be less specific in CISB, as compared with specificity in other CIS, in which all 4 criteria demonstrate dissemination in space.

Objective  To compare the validity indices of Barkhof criteria in CISB with those in other CIS.

Design  Inception cohort with median follow-up of 34 months for CISB and 40 months for other CIS.

Setting  Institutional ambulatory referral center.

Patients  A sample of 51 patients with CISB and 102 patients with other CIS (46 with myelitis and 56 with optic neuritis) was analyzed. Barkhof criteria, with a cutoff of 3 of 4, were applied to magnetic resonance imaging performed at baseline. Four combinations each containing 3 parameters were also applied, with a cutoff of 2 of 3.

Main Outcome Measure  Specificity of unmodified Barkhof criteria and of the 4 combinations to predict conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis.

Results  The specificity of the criteria in CISB was 61% against 73% in other CIS. The combinations that retained the infratentorial lesion parameter had lower specificities in the CISB group; in analysis of the group with other CIS, no such differences were found.

Conclusion  The infratentorial lesion criterion is responsible for the lower specificity of Barkhof criteria in CISB.


From the Unitats de Neuroimmunologia Clínica (Drs Sastre-Garriga, Tintoré, Nos, Río, and Montalban) and Ressonància Magnètica (Dr Rovira), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Neurology, London, England (Dr Thompson).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Validity of the Prodromal Risk Syndrome for First Psychosis: Findings From the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study
Woods et al.
Schizophr Bull 2009;0:sbp027v1-sbp027.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Multiple sclerosis diagnostic criteria: three years later
Polman et al.
Mult Scler 2005;11:5-12.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.