You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 61 No. 10, October 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (10)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Neurogenetics
 •Genetic Disorders
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Validity of Family History Data on Primary Adult-Onset Dystonia

Davide Martino, MD; Maria S. Aniello, MD; Gianluca Masi, MD; Paolo Lamberti, MD; Valeria Lucchese, MD; Simona Lamberti, MD; Paolo Livrea, MD; Alfredo Berardelli, MD; Giovanni Defazio, MD

Arch Neurol. 2004;61:1569-1573.

Background  To our knowledge, no study has assessed the validity of family history data provided by probands with adult-onset dystonia.

Objective  To measure the sensitivity and specificity of interviewing patients with primary adult-onset dystonia as a method for obtaining information on dystonia in first-degree relatives.

Participants  Seventy probands with primary adult-onset dystonia were asked to identify first-degree relatives who had dystonia. Available relatives were then directly examined by a trained neurologist. The validity of the probands’ reports was tested against the neurologists’ diagnoses.

Results  Among 300 first-degree relatives who were examined, 26 received a diagnosis of dystonia. Only 7 of the 26 were identified by the probands’ reports. Among the 274 relatives free of dystonia, the probands reported 5 as having dystonia. The probands’ reports therefore yielded a sensitivity of 27.0% and a specificity of 98.2%.

Conclusions  Because the family history method yields low sensitivity and incurs a risk of misclassification, it is of limited use in family studies of adult-onset dystonia. The only valid means of ascertaining dystonia among relatives remains neurological examination of at-risk subjects.


Author Affiliations: Department of Neurological and Psychiatric Sciences, University of Bari, Bari, Italy (Drs Martino, Aniello, Masi, P. Lamberti, Lucchese, S. Lamberti, Livrea, and Defazio), and Department of Neurological Sciences and Mediterranean Neurological Institute (NEUROMED), University of Rome "La Sapienza," Rome, Italy (Dr Berardelli).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Long-term assessment of the risk of spread in primary late-onset focal dystonia
Abbruzzese et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2008;79:392-396.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Do primary adult-onset focal dystonias share aetiological factors?
Defazio et al.
Brain 2007;130:1183-1193.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A family study on primary blepharospasm
Defazio et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2006;77:252-254.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.