You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 60 No. 4, April 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (17)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Movement Disorders
 •Parkinson Disease/ Parkinsonian Disorders
 •Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery
 •Olfaction and Taste Disorders
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Identifying the Pattern of Olfactory Deficits in Parkinson Disease Using the Brief Smell Identification Test

Kay L. Double, PhD; Dominic B. Rowe, PhD; Michael Hayes, FRACP; Daniel K. Y. Chan, MD; Jeff Blackie, FRACP; Alastair Corbett, FRACP; Ronald Joffe, FRACP; Victor S. Fung, PhD; John Morris, DM; Glenda M. Halliday, PhD

Arch Neurol. 2003;60:545-549.

Background  Selective olfactory deficits occur in 70% to 90% of patients with Parkinson disease, independent of disease severity and duration. Olfactory testing may be a useful diagnostic aid for Parkinson disease, but the types of odors most commonly affected need to be identified.

Objective  To determine the pattern and types of odors affected in Parkinson disease by means of the University of Pennsylvania 12-item Brief Smell Identification Test (B-SIT; Sensonics, Inc, Haddon Heights, NJ).

Design  Testing patients with Parkinson disease and control subjects in 5 movement disorder clinics.

Participants  Forty-nine nondemented patients with Parkinson disease and 52 age- and sex-matched controls.

Main Outcome Measures  Normal or abnormal olfactory function was determined in each subject according to predetermined age and sex norms. Predictive statistics and discriminant function analyses were performed to determine the pattern and types of odors best discriminating patients from controls.

Results  Abnormal olfactory function was present in 40 (82%) of patients compared with 12 (23%) of controls. The B-SIT score was unaffected by smoking behavior, disease duration, or severity. The sensitivity of the B-SIT for Parkinson disease was 0.82, with a specificity and predictive value of 0.82 and 0.77, respectively. Only 5 of the 12 B-SIT odors (gasoline, banana, pineapple, smoke, and cinnamon) were required to adequately discriminate patients with Parkinson disease from controls.

Conclusions  With the use of the B-SIT, 5 specific odors appear primarily affected in patients with Parkinson disease. Significantly, the ability of patients to detect some odors was unimpaired compared with that of controls. Better diagnostic aids could be developed on the basis of the selective pattern of hyposmia observed in Parkinson disease.


From the Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute (Drs Double and Halliday) and Department of Aged Care and Rehabilitation, Bankstown Hospital (Dr Chan), University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Department of Neurology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney (Dr Rowe and Joffe); Department of Neurology, Concord Hospital, Sydney (Drs Hayes and Corbett); Neurology Department, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia (Dr Blackie); and Department of Neurology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney (Drs Fung and Morris).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Odour identification test and its relation to cardiac 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine in patients with drug induced parkinsonism
Lee et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2007;78:1250-1252.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Olfactory Identification and Incidence of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Older Age
Wilson et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2007;64:802-808.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Is it Parkinson's disease, and if not, what is it?
Taylor and Counsell
PN 2006;6:154-165.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.