You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 60 No. 2, February 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Observation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (10)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Surgery
 •Neurosurgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Callosal Neglect

Kenneth M. Heilman, MD; David J. Adams, MD

Arch Neurol. 2003;60:276-279.

Background  According to the interhemispheric inhibition model of neglect, the uninjured hemisphere inhibits (via the corpus callosum) the injured hemisphere but the injured hemisphere can no longer inhibit the opposite hemisphere, which becomes hyperactive and produces an ipsilesional attentional bias. Alternatively, according to the compensation hypothesis, the uninjured hemisphere helps compensate for the damaged hemisphere, which is impaired in directing attention to contralateral stimuli. If the inhibition model of neglect is correct, callosal disconnection should reduce neglect. If the compensation model is correct, however, it may increase or induce neglect.

Patient  A 32-year-old woman, at age 14 years, developed a right frontal astrocytoma and was treated with surgery and radiation but had a cardiopulmonary arrest secondary to aspiration. Subsequent imaging studies revealed damage to the frontal, parietal, and occipital regions of the right hemisphere and damage to the temporal region of the left hemisphere. After discharge, she was able to return to school and drive a car, without any evidence of neglect. About 10 years later, she developed complex partial and atonic seizures that were multifocal and medically intractable. She underwent a complete section of her corpus callosum at age 31 years.

Results  One year after the callosal section, she demonstrated (1) diminished spontaneous saccades to the left, hypometric leftward saccades, and left gaze impersistence; (2) left arm hemispatial limb akinesia; (3) unilateral spatial neglect; and (4) motor and cognitive impersistence.

Conclusion  In patients with right hemisphere injury, callosal section may induce or enhance motor-intentional deficits and hemispatial neglect.


From the Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, and the Neurology Service, Malcom Randall Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Gainesville (Dr Heilman); and the Department of Neurology College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY (Dr Adams).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Dominant limb motor impersistence associated with callosal disconnection
Seo et al.
Neurology 2007;68:862-864.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

What's inside the art? The influence of frontotemporal dementia in art production.
Drago et al.
Neurology 2006;67:1285-1287.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Neurological abnormalities in young adults born preterm
Allin et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2006;77:495-499.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Callosal Neglect Reexamined
Derakhshan
Arch Neurol 2003;60:1493-1493.
FULL TEXT  

Callosal Neglect and Cognitive Impersistence
Mark
Arch Neurol 2003;60:1493-1494.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.