You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 59 No. 6, June 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on ISI (13)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Headache
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Intranasal Civamide for the Treatment of Episodic Cluster Headaches

Joel R. Saper, MD; Jack Klapper, MD; Ninan T. Mathew, MD; Alan Rapoport, MD; Scott B. Phillips, MD; Joel E. Bernstein, MD; for the Intranasal Civamide Study Group

Arch Neurol. 2002;59:990-994.

Objective  To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intranasal civamide solution for preventive treatment during an episodic cluster headache period.

Subjects and Methods  This was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled study with a 7-day treatment period and a 20-day posttreatment period performed at 14 headache/neurology centers in the United States. Twenty-eight subjects were randomized to receive civamide or its vehicle in a 2:1 ratio; 18 received civamide and 10 received the vehicle. Subjects received 100 µL of 0.025% civamide (25 µg) or 100 µL of the vehicle to each nostril via dropper once daily for 7 days. The total daily dose of civamide was 50 µg.

Main Outcome Measures  The number of cluster headaches per week during the treatment and posttreatment periods, pain intensity, presence of associated symptoms, and the incidence of adverse events were assessed.

Results  Subjects in the civamide group had a significantly greater percent decrease in the number of headaches from baseline to posttreatment during days 1 through 7 (-55.5% vs -25.9%; P = .03) and a trend toward significance during days 8 through 14 (-66.9% vs -32.3%; P = .07) and days 15 through 20 (-70.6% vs -34.9%; P = .07), as well as a near-significant decrease during the entire posttreatment period (days 1 through 20 [P = .054]) compared with the vehicle group. There were larger decreases in the number of headaches per week during the posttreatment period in the civamide-treated group, with trends toward significance during posttreatment days 8 through 14 (-8.6 vs -3.6; P = .09) and days 15 through 20 (-8.9 vs -3.6; P = .07). There were no significant differences between groups in cluster headache pain intensity, number of severe headaches, or associated symptoms. The most common adverse events included nasal burning (14 of 18 civamide-treated subjects, 1 of 10 vehicle-treated subjects; P = .001) and lacrimation (9 of 18 civamide-treated subjects, 0 of 10 vehicle-treated subjects; P = .01).

Conclusion  Intranasal civamide solution at a dose of 50 µg may be modestly effective in the preventive treatment of episodic cluster headache.


From the Michigan Headache Pain and Neurological Institute, Ann Arbor (Dr Saper); Colorado Neurology and Headache Center, Denver (Dr Klapper); Houston Headache Clinic, Houston, Tex (Dr Mathew); New England Center for Headache, Stamford, Conn (Dr Rapoport); and Winston Laboratories Inc, Vernon Hills, Ill (Drs Phillips and Bernstein).


RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Neurology Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Neurol. 2002;59(6):1048-1050.
FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.