 |
|
Hospital and Surgeon Determinants of Carotid Endarterectomy Outcomes
Thomas E. Feasby, MD;
Hude Quan, MD,PhD;
William A. Ghali, MD,MPH
Arch Neurol. 2002;59:1877-1881.
Background Prior studies have found associations between surgeon and hospital case volumes and outcomes after carotid endarterectomy (CEA), but they have not simultaneously assessed the importance of a number of surgeon and hospital characteristics.
Objective To simultaneously assess associations between hospital case volume, teaching status, clinical trial participation, and surgeon specialty and case volume and the outcome after CEA.
Design Analysis of a large administrative data-base using logistic regression to correlate adverse outcomes after CEA with surgeon and hospital characteristics.
Setting and Patients A Canadian administrative hospital discharge database of all patients undergoing CEA in fiscal years 1994 through 1997.
Main Outcome Measures In-hospital stroke and/or death.
Results We found an inverse relationship between both hospital and surgeon case volumes and adverse outcomes. Teaching status had no association with outcome, but previous clinical trial participation predicted a better outcome. General surgeons fared worse than other specialists. Low-volume surgeons in low-volume hospitals had a relative risk of 3.5 for adverse outcomes compared with high-volume surgeons in high-volume hospitals.
Conclusions Several physician and hospital characteristics are determinants of outcome after CEA, but the negative effects of low hospital and surgeon case volumes, in particular, suggest that regionalization should be considered for CEA and that surgeons with low case volumes should not be performing CEA.
From the Departments of Clinical Neurosciences (Dr Feasby), Community Health Sciences (Drs Quan and Ghali), and Medicine (Dr Ghali), University of Calgary, and the Calgary Health Region, Calgary, Alberta.
RELATED ARTICLE
Efficacy of Carotid Endarterectomy Translates to Being Efficacious With Appropriate Surgical Skill
H. J. M. Barnett
Arch Neurol. 2002;59(12):1866-1868.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN 2007 Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Carotid Stenting: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents (ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN Clinical Expert Consensus Document Committee on Carotid Stenting)
Bates et al.
Vasc Med 2007;12:35-83.
ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN 2007 Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Carotid Stenting: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents (ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN Clinical Expert Consensus Document Committee on Carotid Stenting)
American Society of Interventional & Therapeutic N et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:126-170.
FULL TEXT
Successful Management of Carotid Stenosis in a High-Risk Population at an Inner-City Hospital
Maldonado et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 2004;38:511-517.
ABSTRACT
Predictors of In-Hospital Mortality and Attributable Risks of Death After Ischemic Stroke: The German Stroke Registers Study Group
Heuschmann et al.
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:1761-1768.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The inappropriate use of carotid endarterectomy
Barnett
CMAJ 2004;171:473-474.
FULL TEXT
Implications of the Leapfrog Initiative for carotid endarterectomy in Michigan
Sunbulli et al.
Neurology 2004;63:590-591.
FULL TEXT
Carotid Endarterectomy: Turning Up the Volume?
Pittman
Arch Neurol 2004;61:296-296.
FULL TEXT
Statewide Assessment of Hospital-Based Stroke Prevention and Treatment Services in North Carolina: Changes Over the Last 5 Years
Camilo and Goldstein
Stroke 2003;34:2945-2950.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Volume-Outcome Conundrum
Kizer
NEJM 2003;349:2159-2161.
FULL TEXT
Efficacy of Carotid Endarterectomy Translates to Being Efficacious With Appropriate Surgical Skill
Barnett
Arch Neurol 2002;59:1866-1868.
FULL TEXT
|
