You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 58 No. 3, March 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (32)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Alzheimer Disease
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Alert me on articles by topic

A Method for Estimating Progression Rates in Alzheimer Disease

Rachelle Smith Doody, MD, PhD; Paul Massman, PhD; J. Kay Dunn, PhD

Arch Neurol. 2001;58:449-454.

Background  The ability to predict progression of disease in patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) would aid clinicians, improve the validation of biomarkers, and contribute to alternative study designs for AD therapies.

Objective  To test a calculated rate of initial decline prior to the first physician visit (preprogression rate) for its ability to predict progression during subsequent follow-up.

Methods  We calculated preprogression rates for 298 patients with probable or possible AD (using the criteria of the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and the Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Associations (NINCDS-ADRDA) with a formula using expected Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores, scores at presentation, and a standardized estimate of duration. The patients are being followed up longitudinally in our Alzheimer Disease Research Center . The time to clinically meaningful deterioration, defined as an MMSE score drop of 5 or more points, was compared for patients stratified as slow, intermediate, and rapid progressors based on the preprogression rate. Cox regression analysis was used to examine the contribution of demographic variables (age, sex, ethnicity, and level of education), initial MMSE scores, estimated symptom duration, and the calculated preprogression rate to the time it took to reach the end point across the groups.

Results  Both initial MMSE (hazard ratio, 0.95 (0.002); z = 4.19; P<.001) and the calculated preprogression rate (hazard ratio, 1.06 (0.019); z = 3.16; P = .002) were significant in determining time to clinically meaningful decline during longitudinal follow-up (Cox regression analysis). Slow, intermediate, and rapid progressors (based on preprogression rates) experienced significantly different time intervals to clinically meaningful deterioration, with the slow progressors taking the longest time, the intermediate progressors in the middle, and the rapid progressors reaching the end point first (log rank {chi}21 = 9.81, P = .002).

Conclusion  An easily calculable rate of early disease progression can classify patients as rapid, intermediate, or slow progressors with good predictive value, even at initial presentation.


From the Departments of Neurology, Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (Drs Doody and Massman), and Internal Medicine, Division of Design and Analysis (Dr Dunn), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex.

Reprints: Rachelle Smith Doody, MD, PhD, Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Neurology, 6550 Fannin St, Suite 1801, Houston, TX 77030.


RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Neurology Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Neurol. 2001;58(3):523-525.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Patient Age Influences Recognition of Alzheimer's Disease
McCarten et al.
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2008;63:625-628.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Atrophy rates accelerate in amnestic mild cognitive impairment
Jack et al.
Neurology 2008;70:1740-1752.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Association between the Polymorphism of CCR5 and Alzheimer's Disease: Results of a Study Performed on Male and Female Patients from Northern Italy
BALISTRERI et al.
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2006;1089:454-461.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Vascular disease and risk factors, rate of progression, and survival in Alzheimer's disease.
Bhargava et al.
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2006;19:78-82.
ABSTRACT  

Religious Attendance and Cognitive Functioning Among Older Mexican Americans
Hill et al.
J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 2006;61:P3-P9.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Predicting the rate of cognitive decline in aging and early Alzheimer disease
Adak et al.
Neurology 2004;63:108-114.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Survival after Initial Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease
Larson et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2004;140:501-509.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Alzheimer Disease: "It's Okay, Mama, If You Want to Go, It's Okay"
Hurley and Volicer
JAMA 2002;288:2324-2331.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessment of health economics in Alzheimer's disease (AHEAD) based on need for full-time care
Caro et al.
Neurology 2001;57:964-971.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.