You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 58 No. 3, March 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (49)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Neurology
 •Alzheimer Disease
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Response of Patients With Alzheimer Disease to Rivastigmine Treatment Is Predicted by the Rate of Disease Progression

Martin R. Farlow, MD; Ann Hake, MD; John Messina, PharmD; Richard Hartman, PhD; Jeffrey Veach, MS; Ravi Anand, MD

Arch Neurol. 2001;58:417-422.

Background  Evidence suggests that disease severity predicts the response of patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) to cholinesterase inhibitor treatment, raising the question of whether disease progression also predicts response to this treatment.

Objective  To evaluate retrospectively whether rate of disease progression during placebo treatment affects response to subsequent rivastigmine tartrate therapy for patients with mild to moderately severe AD.

Design  A 26-week, open-label extension study following a 26-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Setting  Outpatient research centers at 22 sites in the United States.

Patients  We studied 187 of 235 patients originally randomized to receive placebo treatment in the double-blind phase of the trial who continued with open-label (rivastigmine) extension therapy.

Intervention  Placebo treatment for 26 weeks followed by rivastigmine treatment, 2 to 12 mg/d, for 26 weeks.

Main Outcome Measures  Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale–cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog), Progressive Deterioration Scale, Mini-Mental State Examination, and Global Deterioration Scale scores.

Results  Rivastigmine administration during open-label extension therapy benefited patients who had progressed slowly and those who had progressed rapidly during initial double-blind placebo treatment. Slowly progressive patients responded with a mean 1.03-point improvement in the week 26 (ie, start of open-label rivastigmine treatment) ADAS-Cog score at 12 weeks of rivastigmine treatment (week 38 of treatment; P = .02 vs week 26). However, more rapidly progressive patients had a significantly larger mean 4.97-point improvement from the week 26 ADAS-Cog score at 12 weeks (with respect to week 26 of treatment and slowly progressive patient scores, P<.001 for both). Thus, a more rapid disease progression rate while receiving placebo treatment was predictive of a significantly stronger patient response to rivastigmine therapy. This relation also was observed with the other 3 outcome measures and was still apparent when accounting for disease severity.

Conclusions  Rate of disease progression for patients with mild to moderate AD seems to predict response to rivastigmine treatment. Patients with more rapidly progressive disease might be particularly likely to benefit from rivastigmine therapy.


From the Department of Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (Drs Farlow and Hake); and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp, East Hanover, NJ (Drs Messina, Hartman, and Anand and Mr Veach). Dr Farlow has acted as a consultant to, or been provided research support by, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp, the sponsor of study B353, from which the data presented herein were derived.

Corresponding author and reprints: Martin R. Farlow, MD, Department of Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, CL583, 541 Clinical Dr, Indianapolis, IN 46202-5111 (e-mail: mfarlow{at}iupui.edu).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Effectiveness of Cholinesterase Inhibitors and Memantine for Treating Dementia: Evidence Review for a Clinical Practice Guideline
Raina et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;148:379-397.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Phase II/III randomized trial of TCH346 in patients with ALS
Miller et al.
Neurology 2007;69:776-784.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reality orientation therapy combined with cholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer's disease: randomised controlled trial
ONDER et al.
Br. J. Psychiatry 2005;187:450-455.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Predicting the outcome of cholinesterase inhibitor treatment in Alzheimer's disease
Connelly et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2005;76:320-324.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Size of the treatment effect on cognition of cholinesterase inhibition in Alzheimer's disease
Rockwood
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2004;75:677-685.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Use of Cholinesterase Inhibitors in Clinical Practice: Evidence-Based Recommendations
Cummings
Focus 2004;2:239-252.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Efficacy and safety of cholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer's disease: a meta-analysis
Lanctot et al.
CMAJ 2003;169:557-564.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Management of Alzheimer's Disease
Grossberg and Desai
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2003;58:M331-M353.
FULL TEXT  

Long-term cholinesterase inhibitor therapy for Alzheimer's disease: Implications for long-term care
Brangman
AM J ALZHEIMERS DIS OTHER DEMEN 2003;18:79-84.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.