You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 58 No. 2, February 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (30)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Deep Brain Stimulation
 •Movement Disorders
 •Parkinson Disease/ Parkinsonian Disorders
 •Tremor
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation

Comparison Between Unilateral and Bilateral Placement

William Ondo, MD; Michael Almaguer, RN; Joseph Jankovic, MD; Richard K. Simpson, MD, PhD

Arch Neurol. 2001;58:218-222.

Background  Unilateral thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) is accepted as an effective treatment for essential tremor (ET) and the tremor of Parkinson disease (PD). There are, however, relatively little data concerning bilateral thalamic DBS and no thorough comparisons between the 2 methods.

Methods  To assess the relative benefit of a staged second contralateral DBS placement in patients with PD and ET, we compared preoperative baseline assessments with those at 3 months after the initial implantation, and again at 3 months after the second contralateral implantation. The assessments included the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale for patients with PD (n = 8) and a modified Unified Tremor Rating Assessment for patients with ET (n = 13). The design included open and blinded (unknown activation status) assessments.

Results  Overall, after the second implantation, all specific measures assessing tremor contralateral to that side improved in patients with PD and ET, generally without sacrificing those contralateral to the first side implantation. Midline tremors (face and head) improved only after the second side implantation. In patients with ET, functional and subjective scores tended to further improve after the second placement; however, patients with PD had less subjective improvement. Hand tremor scores in patients with ET randomized to "on" stimulation improved from 6.7 ± 0.9 to 1.3 ± 1.2 (P<.005). The scores of patients with PD randomized to on stimulation improved from 9.3 ± 1.0 to 1.0 ± 0.5. (Data are given as mean ± SD.) Tremor scores did not change from baseline in those patients randomized to "off" stimulation in either group. Adverse events related to stimulation increased after the second implantation in both groups.

Conclusions  Bilateral thalamic DBS is more effective than unilateral DBS at controlling bilateral appendicular and midline tremors of ET and PD. Despite this, overall functional disability only improved in patients with ET, possibly secondary to more problematic adverse events in patients with PD, especially balance problems. Bilateral DBS should be considered when unilateral DBS does not offer satisfactory benefit, especially in patients with ET.


From the Departments of Neurology (Drs Ondo and Jankovic and Mr Almaguer) and Neurosurgery (Dr Simpson), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex.

Corresponding author and reprints: William Ondo, MD, Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, 6550 Fannin Dr, Suite 1801, Houston, TX 77030 (e-mail: wondo{at}bcm.tmc.edu).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Neurology Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Neurol. 2001;58(2):320-322.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Tremor entrainment by patterned low-frequency stimulation
Barnikol et al.
Phil Trans R Soc A 2008;366:3545-3573.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Bilateral stimulation of the caudal zona incerta nucleus for tremor control
Plaha et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2008;79:504-513.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The effect of deep brain stimulation on quality of life in movement disorders
Diamond and Jankovic
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2005;76:1188-1193.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Bilateral thalamic deep brain stimulation: midline tremor control
Putzke et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2005;76:684-690.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Identification of target areas for deep brain stimulation in human basal ganglia substructures based on median nerve sensory evoked potential criteria
Klostermann et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2003;74:1031-1035.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Surgery for Parkinson Disease and Other Movement Disorders: Benefits and Limitations of Ablation, Stimulation, Restoration, and Radiation
Jankovic
Arch Neurol 2001;58:1970-1972.
FULL TEXT  

Bilateral Deep-Brain Stimulation for Tremor
JWatch Neurology 2001;2001:4-4.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.