 |
 |

Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation
Comparison Between Unilateral and Bilateral Placement
William Ondo, MD;
Michael Almaguer, RN;
Joseph Jankovic, MD;
Richard K. Simpson, MD, PhD
Arch Neurol. 2001;58:218-222.
Background Unilateral thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) is accepted as an effective
treatment for essential tremor (ET) and the tremor of Parkinson disease (PD).
There are, however, relatively little data concerning bilateral thalamic DBS
and no thorough comparisons between the 2 methods.
Methods To assess the relative benefit of a staged second contralateral DBS
placement in patients with PD and ET, we compared preoperative baseline assessments
with those at 3 months after the initial implantation, and again at 3 months
after the second contralateral implantation. The assessments included the
Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale for patients with PD (n = 8) and
a modified Unified Tremor Rating Assessment for patients with ET (n = 13).
The design included open and blinded (unknown activation status) assessments.
Results Overall, after the second implantation, all specific measures assessing
tremor contralateral to that side improved in patients with PD and ET, generally
without sacrificing those contralateral to the first side implantation. Midline
tremors (face and head) improved only after the second side implantation.
In patients with ET, functional and subjective scores tended to further improve
after the second placement; however, patients with PD had less subjective
improvement. Hand tremor scores in patients with ET randomized to "on" stimulation
improved from 6.7 ± 0.9 to 1.3 ± 1.2 (P<.005).
The scores of patients with PD randomized to on stimulation improved from
9.3 ± 1.0 to 1.0 ± 0.5. (Data are given as mean ± SD.)
Tremor scores did not change from baseline in those patients randomized to
"off" stimulation in either group. Adverse events related to stimulation increased
after the second implantation in both groups.
Conclusions Bilateral thalamic DBS is more effective than unilateral DBS at controlling
bilateral appendicular and midline tremors of ET and PD. Despite this, overall
functional disability only improved in patients with ET, possibly secondary
to more problematic adverse events in patients with PD, especially balance
problems. Bilateral DBS should be considered when unilateral DBS does not
offer satisfactory benefit, especially in patients with ET.
From the Departments of Neurology (Drs Ondo and Jankovic and Mr Almaguer)
and Neurosurgery (Dr Simpson), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex.
Corresponding author and reprints: William Ondo, MD, Department of
Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, 6550 Fannin Dr, Suite 1801, Houston,
TX 77030 (e-mail: wondo{at}bcm.tmc.edu).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Archives of Neurology Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Neurol. 2001;58(2):320-322.
FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Tremor entrainment by patterned low-frequency stimulation
Barnikol et al.
Phil Trans R Soc A 2008;366:3545-3573.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Bilateral stimulation of the caudal zona incerta nucleus for tremor control
Plaha et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2008;79:504-513.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The effect of deep brain stimulation on quality of life in movement disorders
Diamond and Jankovic
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2005;76:1188-1193.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Bilateral thalamic deep brain stimulation: midline tremor control
Putzke et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2005;76:684-690.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Identification of target areas for deep brain stimulation in human basal ganglia substructures based on median nerve sensory evoked potential criteria
Klostermann et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2003;74:1031-1035.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Surgery for Parkinson Disease and Other Movement Disorders: Benefits and Limitations of Ablation, Stimulation, Restoration, and Radiation
Jankovic
Arch Neurol 2001;58:1970-1972.
FULL TEXT
Bilateral Deep-Brain Stimulation for Tremor
JWatch Neurology 2001;2001:4-4.
FULL TEXT
|