You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 58 No. 10, October 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (50)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Alzheimer Disease
 •Behavioral Neurology
 •Cerebrovascular Disease
 •Dementias
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Recognition Memory and Verbal Fluency Differentiate Probable Alzheimer Disease From Subcortical Ischemic Vascular Dementia

Mary C. Tierney, PhD; Sandra E. Black, MD; John P. Szalai, PhD; W. Gary Snow, PhD; Rory H. Fisher, MB; Grant Nadon, MD; Helena C. Chui, MD

Arch Neurol. 2001;58:1654-1659.

Background  Alzheimer disease (AD) and vascular dementia are among the most frequently occurring causes of dementia in the world, and their accurate differentiation is important because different pharmaceutical strategies may modify the course of each disease.

Objective  To determine which of 10 neuropsychological test scores can accurately differentiate patients with probable AD from those with subcortical ischemic vascular dementia (SIVD) for use in evidence-based clinical practice.

Design  Patients with suspected dementia were referred to the study by family physicians, geriatricians, and neurologists. All participants received a thorough assessment according to standard diagnostic guidelines. Diagnoses of probable AD (n = 31) and probable SIVD (n = 31) were made according to consensus criteria. The diagnosticians were blind to the results of the 10 neuropsychological test scores.

Results  There were no significant differences between the groups in age or Mini-Mental State Examination scores. Logistic regression analyses identified 2 neuropsychological tests that best distinguished the groups (sensitivity = 81%; specificity = 84%; positive likelihood ratio = 5.1). These were the recognition memory subtest of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test and the Controlled Oral Word Association Test. The AD group performed better on the oral association test, whereas the SIVD group did better on the recognition memory test.

Conclusion  Patients with probable AD and probable SIVD can be distinguished with a high degree of accuracy using these 2 neuropsychological tests.


From Geriatric Research (Drs Tierney and Snow) and the Department of Family and Community Medicine (Dr Tierney), the Department of Medicine (Neurology) (Dr Black), Clinical Epidemiology and Health Services Research (Dr Szalai), and the Department of Medicine (Geriatric Medicine) (Drs Fisher and Nadon), Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario; and the Department of Neurology (Dr Chui), University of Southern California, Los Angeles.

Corresponding author and reprints: Mary C. Tierney, Geriatric Research, A145, Sunnybrook and Women's Health Sciences Center, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4N 3M5 (e-mail: mary.tierney{at}swchsc.on.ca).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Diagnosis and treatment of dementia: 2. Diagnosis
Feldman et al.
CMAJ 2008;178:825-836.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Preclinical Vascular Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer Disease: Neuropsychological Test Performance 5 Years Before Diagnosis
Ingles et al.
Stroke 2007;38:1148-1153.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Canadian Stroke Network Vascular Cognitive Impairment Harmonization Standards
Hachinski et al.
Stroke 2006;37:2220-2241.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cognitive profile in CADASIL
Buffon et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2006;77:175-180.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cognitive profile of subcortical ischaemic vascular disease
Jokinen et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2006;77:28-33.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Genetics of Vascular Cognitive Impairment: The Opportunity and the Challenges
Leblanc et al.
Stroke 2006;37:248-255.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Pattern of Cognitive Performance in CADASIL: A Monogenic Condition Leading to Subcortical Ischemic Vascular Dementia
Peters et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2005;162:2078-2085.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Driver landmark and traffic sign identification in early Alzheimer's disease
Uc et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2005;76:764-768.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effects of White Matter Lesions and Lacunes on Cortical Function
Reed et al.
Arch Neurol 2004;61:1545-1550.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evaluation of visual recognition memory in MCI patients
Barbeau et al.
Neurology 2004;62:1317-1322.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Diagnostic utility of abbreviated fluency measures in Alzheimer disease and vascular dementia
Canning et al.
Neurology 2004;62:556-562.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effects of subcortical ischemic vascular dementia and AD on entorhinal cortex and hippocampus
Du et al.
Neurology 2002;58:1635-1641.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.