You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 57 No. 9, September 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Neurological Review
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (38)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Genetic Disorders
 •HIV/AIDS
 •Alzheimer Disease
 •Cerebrovascular Disease
 •Dementias
 •Epilepsy
 •Movement Disorders
 •Parkinson Disease/ Parkinsonian Disorders
 •Stroke
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Antioxidant Therapy in Neurologic Disease

Norman Delanty, MD; Marc A. Dichter, MD, PhD

Arch Neurol. 2000;57:1265-1270.

Free radical or oxidative injury may be a fundamental mechanism underlying a number of human neurologic diseases. Therapy using free radical scavengers (antioxidants) has the potential to prevent, delay, or ameliorate many neurologic disorders. However, the biochemistry of oxidative pathobiology is complex, and optimum antioxidant therapeutic options may vary and need to be tailored to individual diseases. In vitro and animal model studies support the potential beneficial role of various antioxidant compounds in neurologic disease. However, the results of clinical trials using various antioxidants, including vitamin E, tirilazad, N-acetylcysteine, and ebselen, have been mixed. Potential reasons for these mixed results include lack of pretrial dose-finding studies and failure to appreciate and characterize the individual unique oxidative processes occurring in different diseases. Moreover, therapy with antioxidants may need to be given early in chronic insidious neurologic disorders to achieve an appreciable clinical benefit. Predisease screening and intervention in at-risk individuals may also need to be considered in the near future.


From the Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (Drs Delanty and Dichter). Dr Delanty is now with the Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin.


RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Neurology Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Neurol. 2000;57(9):1387-1388.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Antioxidant and anti-mutagenic effects of ebselen in yeast and in cultured mammalian V79 cells
Miorelli et al.
Mutagenesis 2008;23:93-99.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Redox Neurology: Visions of an Emerging Subspecialty
SCHIPPER
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2004;1012:342-355.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.