 |
|
Multiple Sclerosis—From Probable to Definite Diagnosis
A 7-Year Prospective Study
Anat Achiron, MD, PhD;
Yoram Barak, MD
Arch Neurol. 2000;57:974-979.
Objectives To investigate the rate of progression from probable to clinically definite multiple sclerosis (MS) and to define patients who had rapidly (within 1 year) progressed to a definite diagnosis.
Design A 7-year prospective study.
Patients A group of 163 patients experiencing their first episode of neurologic symptoms suggestive of MS. All patients had brain magnetic resonance imaging that demonstrated at least 3 demyelinating lesions at onset.
Results Within the follow-up period (mean, 42 months; range, 13-84 months), 136 patients (83.4%) had an additional relapse and were thus defined as having clinically definite MS, whereas 27 patients (16.6%) were defined as having clinically probable MS. Most of the 136 patients with clinically definite MS (57.6%, 94 patients) experienced the additional relapse within 1 year. Demographic and clinical parameters at presentation were analyzed to identify variables predictive of rapid progression (within 1 year) to clinical definite MS. Motor involvement at onset was the only clinical parameter associated with rapid progression to a definite diagnosis. Survival curves demonstrated that polysymptomatic involvement and higher Extended Disability Status Scale score at presentation correlated with rapid progression to definite diagnosis.
Conclusion Most patients with a diagnosis of probable MS and positive brain magnetic resonance imaging will progress rapidly to clinically definite MS.
From the Multiple Sclerosis Center, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer (Dr Achiron), and Abarbanel Mental Health Center, Bat Yam (Dr Barak), Israel.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLES
Archives of Neurology Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Neurol. 2000;57(7):1089-1090.
FULL TEXT
To Treat, or Not to Treat: The Therapeutic Dilemma of Idiopathic Monosymptomatic Demyelinating Syndromes
Elliot M. Frohman, Michael Racke, and Stanley van den Noort
Arch Neurol. 2000;57(7):930-932.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Intravenous Immunoglobulin Treatment Following the First Demyelinating Event Suggestive of Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
Achiron et al.
Arch Neurol 2004;61:1515-1520.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Longitudinal disability curves for predicting the course of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
Achiron et al.
Mult Scler 2003;9:486-491.
ABSTRACT
The utility of MRI in suspected MS: Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology
Frohman et al.
Neurology 2003;61:602-611.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Antimyelin Antibodies as a Predictor of Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis after a First Demyelinating Event
Berger et al.
NEJM 2003;349:139-145.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Cognitive impairment in probable multiple sclerosis
Achiron and Barak
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2003;74:443-446.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Horizontal monocular saccadic failure: an unusual clinically isolated syndrome progressing to multiple sclerosis
Frohman and Frohman
Mult Scler 2003;9:55-58.
ABSTRACT
Predictors of short-term disease activity following a first clinical demyelinating event: analysis of the CHAMPS placebo groupy
CHAMPS Study Group
Mult Scler 2002;8:405-409.
ABSTRACT
Isolated demyelinating syndromes: comparison of CSF oligoclonal bands and different MR imaging criteria to predict conversion to CDMS
Tintore et al.
Mult Scler 2001;7:359-363.
ABSTRACT
To Treat, or Not to Treat: The Therapeutic Dilemma of Idiopathic Monosymptomatic Demyelinating Syndromes
Frohman et al.
Arch Neurol 2000;57:930-932.
FULL TEXT
|
