 |
 |

Neuropsychologic Status in Multiple Sclerosis After Treatment With Glatiramer
Amy Weinstein, PhD;
Steven I. L. Schwid, MD;
Randolph B. Schiffer, MD;
Michael P. McDermott, PhD;
Daniel W. Giang, MD;
Andrew D. Goodman, MD
Arch Neurol. 1999;56:319-324.
Background Glatiramer acetate (Copaxone) therapy reduces clinical disease activity in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS).
Objective To study the effect of glatiramer therapy on neuropsychologic function as part of a randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial.
Methods Two hundred forty-eight patients with relapsing-remitting MS and mild to moderate disability (Expanded Disability Status Scale score, <5.0) were tested before and 12 and 24 months after randomization to administration of glatiramer acetate, 20 mg/d, or matching placebo. Neuropsychologic tests examined 5 cognitive domains most often disrupted in patients with MS: sustained attention, perceptual processing, verbal and visuospatial memory, and semantic retrieval.
Results Baseline neuropsychologic test performance was similar in both treatment groups and was within normal range, except for impaired semantic retrieval. Mean neuropsychologic test scores were higher at 12 and 24 months than at baseline, and no differences were detected between treatment groups over time. No significant interactions were detected between treatment and either time or baseline impairment.
Conclusions Our 2-year longitudinal study showed no effect of glatiramer therapy on cognitive function in relapsing-remitting MS. Although it is possible that glatiramer therapy has no effect on cognitive function, the lack of measurable decline in cognitive function in both patient groups for 2 years limits the opportunity for glatiramer to demonstrate a therapeutic effect by minimizing such decline. Emerging treatments for MS should continue to be examined for their effect on cognitive impairment because it can be a critical determinant of disability. A greater understanding of the natural history of cognitive decline in MS is essential for a rational design of these drug trials.
From the Departments of Neurology (Drs Weinstein, Schwid, Schiffer, McDermott, and Goodman), Psychiatry (Drs Weinstein and Schiffer), Environmental Medicine (Dr Schiffer), and Biostatistics (Dr McDermott), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; and the Department of Neurology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, Calif (Dr Giang).
RELATED ARTICLE
Archives of Neurology Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Neurol. 1999;56(3):370-371.
FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Cognitive dysfunction in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
Nocentini et al.
Mult Scler 2006;12:77-87.
ABSTRACT
A longitudinal study of cognition in primary progressive multiple sclerosis
Camp et al.
Brain 2005;128:2891-2898.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
One-year cyclophosphamide treatment combined with methylprednisolone improves cognitive dysfunction in progressive forms of multiple sclerosis
Zephir et al.
Mult Scler 2005;11:360-363.
ABSTRACT
Treating cognitive deficits in multiple sclerosis: Are we there yet?
Doraiswamy and Rao
Neurology 2004;63:1552-1553.
FULL TEXT
Differences in cognitive impairment of relapsing remitting, secondary, and primary progressive MS
Huijbregts et al.
Neurology 2004;63:335-339.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Cognitive performance and MR markers of cerebral injury in cognitively impaired MS patients
Christodoulou et al.
Neurology 2003;60:1793-1798.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Immunomodulatory Agents for the Treatment of Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review
Galetta et al.
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:2161-2169.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Current Immunotherapy for Demyelinating Diseases
Bashir and Whitaker
Arch Neurol 2002;59:726-731.
FULL TEXT
Cognitive impairments in multiple sclerosis: A review
DeSousa et al.
AM J ALZHEIMERS DIS OTHER DEMEN 2002;17:23-29.
ABSTRACT
The Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Tests: normative values allow application in multiple sclerosis clinical practice
Boringa et al.
Mult Scler 2001;7:263-267.
ABSTRACT
Multiple sclerosis, disease modifying treatments and depression: a critical methodological review
Feinstein
Mult Scler 2000;6:343-348.
ABSTRACT
|