You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 56 No. 3, March 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Neurological Review
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (45)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Alzheimer Disease
 •Neuropathology
 •Diagnosis
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Biomarkers of Alzheimer Disease

John H. Growdon, MD

Arch Neurol. 1999;56:281-283.

A definitive diagnosis of Alzheimer disease (AD) depends on finding widespread neurofibrillary tangles and plentiful neuritic plaques in the brain of an individual with a clinical diagnosis of progressive dementia.1 Using contemporary diagnostic criteria, the antemortem diagnosis of probable AD in centers specialized for AD is confirmed 80% to 90% of the time. There is the suspicion, but no firm data, that diagnostic accuracy is much lower outside of practices dedicated to patients with dementia. Furthermore, the diagnostic workup is expensive. In most settings, the evaluation generally includes a careful medical history and physical examination; neurologic examination (and psychiatric consultation as indicated); laboratory blood studies to exclude underlying metabolic and medical illnesses that masquerade as AD; a mental status assessment and formal cognitive tests; and a computed tomographic scan or magnetic resonance imaging of the brain.2 Because these procedures are time-consuming and costly, there is a need to identify biological tests that can circumvent aspects of this workup and point the physician to the correct diagnosis. It would be highly desirable to measure a subtance or substances in blood or urine samples or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) that would lead to a positive diagnosis of AD without the need for specialized dementia clinics and the expense and time of standard diagnostic evaluations. In response to this need, the Reagan Research Institute of the Alzheimer's Association and the National Institute on Aging convened a working group in 1997 to examine the status of various antemortem markers for AD. The consensus statement of this group, entitled "Molecular and Biochemical Markers of AD," was published in 1998.3 The consensus statement first defined the characteristics of an ideal biomarker, and then outlined the steps required for a proposed biomarker to achieve acceptance by the medical community. Finally, the statement reviewed the current state of all proposed biological markers. The workshop participants observed that none of the current biomarkers had yet achieved universal acceptance and concluded none fully met the consensus criteria for an ideal marker. Nonetheless, several tests were identified as good markers for familial AD, and several other tests showed promise as a diagnostic aid for sporadic AD. The purpose of this review is to put these recommendations into a practical context. What does the consensus statement tell the practicing clinician? How do the opinions in the consensus statement affect clinical practice in diagnosing and treating patients with dementia?


From the Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass.


RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Neurology Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Neurol. 1999;56(3):370-371.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Alzheimer Disease: Postmortem Neuropathologic Correlates of Antemortem 1H MR Spectroscopy Metabolite Measurements
Kantarci et al.
Radiology 2008;248:210-220.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Post-mortem correlates of in vivo PiB-PET amyloid imaging in a typical case of Alzheimer's disease
Ikonomovic et al.
Brain 2008;131:1630-1645.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cerebrospinal Fluid Tau and {beta}-Amyloid: How Well Do These Biomarkers Reflect Autopsy-Confirmed Dementia Diagnoses?
Clark et al.
Arch Neurol 2003;60:1696-1702.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Biochemical Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease by Measuring the Cerebrospinal Fluid Ratio of Phosphorylated tau Protein to {beta}-Amyloid Peptide42
Maddalena et al.
Arch Neurol 2003;60:1202-1206.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Anesthesia, the aging brain, and the surgical patient
Crosby and Culley
Canadian J. Anesthesia 2003;50:R12-12.
FULL TEXT  

Alzheimer Disease: Current Concepts and Emerging Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies
Clark and Karlawish
ANN INTERN MED 2003;138:400-410.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Levels of Nonphosphorylated and Phosphorylated Tau in Cerebrospinal Fluid of Alzheimer's Disease Patients : An Ultrasensitive Bienzyme-Substrate-Recycle Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
Hu et al.
Am. J. Pathol. 2002;160:1269-1278.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Amyloid precursor protein in platelets: A peripheral marker for the diagnosis of sporadic AD
Padovani et al.
Neurology 2001;57:2243-2248.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Biomarker Identification by Feature Wrappers
Xiong et al.
Genome Res 2001;11:1878-1887.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Altered glycosylation of acetylcholinesterase in lumbar cerebrospinal fluid of patients with Alzheimer's disease
Saez-Valero et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2000;69:664-667.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Neurology and psychiatry: Closing the great divide
Price et al.
Neurology 2000;54:8-8.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.