This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (26)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Cerebrovascular Disease  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

A PET Study

Ralph-Axel Müller, PhD; Robert D. Rothermel, PhD; Michael E. Behen, MA; Otto Muzik, PhD; Thomas J. Mangner, PhD; Harry T. Chugani, MD

Arch Neurol. 1998;55:1113-1119.

Objective  There is extensive evidence for postlesional plasticity in the language and motor domains. We examined possible domain-specific differences in reorganizational patterns, hypothesizing that interhemispheric reorganization would be predominantly homotopic for language, but predominantly nonhomotopic for motor control.

Design  Using oxygen 15–water positron emission tomography, regional cerebral blood flow was studied during rest, listening to sentences, repetition of sentences, and finger tapping of the right hand. Task-specific primary, secondary, and tertiary regions of interest were defined according to the degree of regional involvement in language/motor functions as documented in previous studies. Regional activations were compared within and across functional domains.

Patients  Nine patients (aged 4-20 years) with unilateral left hemisphere lesion involving both the primary motor and perisylvian language cortices were studied. Two samples of healthy adults were included for additional comparisons.

Main Outcome Measure  Hemispheric asymmetry of blood flow changes within regions of interest.

Results  As predicted, rightward asymmetry of activations in primary and secondary regions was stronger for language than for movement, but the expected inverse difference for tertiary regions (greater rightward asymmetry of motor activations) was not found. Within-domain comparisons showed that for listening to sentences, rightward asymmetry was strongest in primary and weakest in tertiary regions, whereas the inverse differences were found for movement.

Conclusion  The findings suggest a greater potential for homotopic interhemispheric reorganization in the language than in the motor domain. Interhemispheric motor reorganization was generally limited.

From the Departments of Pediatrics (Drs Müller, Rothermel, Muzik, and Chugani and Mr Behen), Psychiatry (Dr Rothermel), Neurology (Dr Chugani), and Radiology (Drs Mangner and Chugani), Wayne State University Medical School, Detroit, Mich.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Language dominance in partial epilepsy patients identified with an fMRI reading task
Gaillard et al.
Neurology 2002;59:256-265.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Interhemispheric Reorganization of Motor Hand Function to the Primary Motor Cortex Predicted With Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Rutten et al.
J Child Neurol 2002;17:292-297.
ABSTRACT  

Sturge-Weber syndrome: Correlation between clinical course and FDG PET findings
Lee et al.
Neurology 2001;57:189-195.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Functional anatomy of cognitive development: fMRI of verbal fluency in children and adults
Gaillard et al.
Neurology 2000;54:180-180.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT