You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 55 No. 8, August 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (34)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Neurology, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Pharmacological Therapy in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy

K. Kompoliti, MD; C. G. Goetz, MD; Irene Litvan, MD; K. Jellinger, MD; M. Verny, MD

Arch Neurol. 1998;55:1099-1102.

Background  To our knowledge, previous reports on drug treatment in progressive supranuclear palsy have not evaluated autopsy-confirmed cases.

Objective  To evaluate pharmacological treatment responses from detailed clinical records in patients with autopsy-confirmed progressive supranuclear palsy.

Subjects and Methods  We reviewed medical records for clinical presentation and pharmacological response in 12 patients with autopsy-confirmed progressive supranuclear palsy diagnosed using the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke pathologic criteria. For each drug class, exposure, global positive response, and specific positive response (parkinsonism, other movement disorders, or gaze dysfunction) were recorded.

Results  Drug classes examined were dopaminergics (all patients), tricyclics (3 patients), methysergide maleate (3 patients), 5-hydroxytryptophan (2 patients), and anticholinergics and selective serotonin inhibitors (1 patient). Positive clinical response was detected in 7 of the patients receiving dopaminergic drugs and in 1 patient each receiving tricyclics, methysergide, and 5-hydroxytryptophan, respectively. None of the patients responded markedly however, and there was no persistent beneficial effect. Use of dopaminergic drugs most frequently improved parkinsonian features, but disabling adverse effects included orthostatic hypotension (6 patients), hallucinations and delusions (3 patients), gastrointestinal complaints (3 patients), and dizziness (1 patient). Only 1 patient developed dyskinesia.

Conclusion  Use of antiparkinsonian medications and other neurotransmitter replacement therapies was largely ineffective and caused frequent adverse effects in this series of patients with autopsy-confirmed with progressive supranuclear palsy.


From the Rush-Presbyterian-St Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, Ill (Drs Kompoliti and Goetz); Neuroepidemiology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (Dr Litvan); Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Clinical Neurobiology, Vienna, Austria (Dr Jellinger); and Hôpital Charles Foix, Paris, France (Dr Verny).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A clinical rating scale for progressive supranuclear palsy
Golbe and Ohman-Strickland
Brain 2007;130:1552-1565.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Progressive Supranuclear Palsy: Disease Profile and Rehabilitation Strategies
Zampieri and Di Fabio
ptjournal 2006;86:870-880.
FULL TEXT  

Progression of gait, speech and swallowing deficits in progressive supranuclear palsy
Goetz et al.
Neurology 2003;60:917-922.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Randomized placebo-controlled trial of donepezil in patients with progressive supranuclear palsy
Litvan et al.
Neurology 2001;57:467-473.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.