This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (131)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Aging/ Geriatrics  • Alzheimer Disease  • Cognitive Disorders  • Diagnosis  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Paul R. Solomon, PhD; Aliina Hirschoff; Bridget Kelly; Mahri Relin; Michael Brush; Richard D. DeVeaux, PhD; William W. Pendlebury, MD

Arch Neurol. 1998;55:349-355.

Objective  To determine the validity and reliability of a rapidly administered neurocognitive screening battery consisting of 4 brief tests (Enhanced Cued Recall, Temporal Orientation, Verbal Fluency, and Clock Drawing) to distinguish between patients with probable Alzheimer's disease (AD) and healthy control subjects.

Subjects  Sixty successive referrals to the Memory Disorders Clinic at Southwestern Vermont Medical Center, Bennington, who were diagnosed as having probable AD and 60 community-dwelling volunteers of comparable age, sex distribution, and education.

Design  Interrater and test-retest reliability, intergroup comparisons between patients with AD and control subjects on the 4 individual tests, and determination of probability of dementia for patients with AD and control subjects using the entire battery of tests.

Setting  Outpatient care.

Main Outcome Measure  Comparison of the probability of dementia on the 7 Minute Screen with the criterion standard of clinical diagnosis established by examination and laboratory studies.

Secondary Outcome Measures  Test-retest and interrater reliability (correlation coefficients), time for administration.

Results  Mean time of administration was 7 minutes 42 seconds. Mean scores for patients with AD and control subjects on all 4 individual tests were significantly different (for each, P<.001). When the 4 tests were combined in a logistic regression, the battery had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 100%. A series of 1000 repeated random samples of 30 patients with AD and 30 control subjects taken from the overall sample of 60 patients with AD and 60 control subjects had a mean sensitivity of 92% and a mean specificity of 96%. The battery was equally sensitive to patients with mild AD as demonstrated by correctly classifying all 13 patients with AD using Mini-Mental State Examination scores of 24 or higher. Neither age nor education was a statistically significant factor when added as a covariate. Test-retest reliabilities for individual tests ranged from 0.83 to 0.93. Test-retest reliability for the entire battery was 0.91. Interrater reliability for the entire battery was 0.92.

Conclusions  The 7 Minute Screen appears highly sensitive to AD and may be useful in helping to make initial distinctions between patients experiencing cognitive changes related to the normal aging process and those experiencing cognitive deficits related to dementing disorders such as AD. It has reasonable interrater and test-retest reliability, can be administered in a brief period, and requires no clinical judgment and minimal training.

From the Department of Psychology (Dr Solomon and Ms Hirschoff), the Program in Neuroscience (Dr Solomon and Mss Hirschoff, Kelly, and Relin, and Mr Brush), and the Department of Mathematics (Dr DeVeaux), Williams College, Williamstown, Mass; the Departments of Pathology and Neurology (Dr Pendlebury), University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington; and the Memory Disorders Clinic, Southwestern Vermont Medical Center (Drs Solomon and Pendlebury), Bennington.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Clock Drawing Test--Modified and Integrated Approach (CDT-MIA) as an Instrument for Detecting Mild Cognitive Impairment in a Specialized Outpatient Setting
Heinik and Shaikewitz
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2009;22:171-180.
ABSTRACT  

Development and Evaluation of a Computerized Test Battery for Alzheimer's Disease Screening in Community-based Settings
Inoue et al.
AM J ALZHEIMERS DIS OTHER DEMEN 2009;24:129-135.
ABSTRACT  

A Review of Telephone-Administered Screening Tests for Dementia Diagnosis
Smith et al.
AM J ALZHEIMERS DIS OTHER DEMEN 2009;24:58-69.
ABSTRACT  

General practice-based intervention for suspecting and detecting dementia in France: A cluster randomized controlled trial1
Rondeau et al.
Dementia 2008;7:433-450.
ABSTRACT  

Dementia of the Alzheimer Type
Jalbert et al.
Epidemiol Rev 2008;30:15-34.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Self-reports on the IQCODE in Older Adults: A Psychometric Evaluation
Jansen et al.
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2008;21:83-92.
ABSTRACT  

Diagnosis and treatment of dementia: 2. Diagnosis
Feldman et al.
CMAJ 2008;178:825-836.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Demented versus non-demented very old inpatients: the same comorbidities but poorer functional and nutritional status
Zekry et al.
Age Ageing 2008;37:83-89.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A review of screening tests for cognitive impairment
Cullen et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2007;78:790-799.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Paradoxical recovery in a bilingual patient with aphasia after right capsuloputaminal infarction
Garcia-Caballero et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2007;78:89-91.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Memory Dysfunction
Budson and Price
NEJM 2005;352:692-699.
FULL TEXT  

Clock Drawing Test-Modified and Integrated Approach(CDT-MIA): Description and Preliminary Examination of its Validity and Reliability in Dementia Patients Referred to a Specialized Psychogeriatric Setting
Heinik et al.
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2004;17:73-80.
ABSTRACT  

Detecting dementia in just 12 minutes: the seven minute screen
Henderson
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2004;75:666-667.
FULL TEXT  

The seven minute screen: a neurocognitive screening test highly sensitive to various types of dementia
Meulen et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2004;75:700-705.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Are the Clock-Drawing Test and the MMSE Combined Interchangeable with CAMCOG as a Dementia Evaluation Instrument in a Specialized Outpatient Setting?
Heinik et al.
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2003;16:74-79.
ABSTRACT  

A cognitive and physical performance assessment of retirees entering a continuing care retirement community: The Moorings Assessment Protocol
Wimberley et al.
AM J ALZHEIMERS DIS OTHER DEMEN 2003;18:73-78.
ABSTRACT  

The clock drawing test is a poor screen for very mild dementia
Powlishta et al.
Neurology 2002;59:898-903.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Visual association test to detect early dementia of the Alzheimer type
Lindeboom et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2002;73:126-133.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Greek validation of the Seven-Minute Screening Battery for Alzheimer's disease in the elderly
Tsolaki et al.
AM J ALZHEIMERS DIS OTHER DEMEN 2002;17:139-148.
ABSTRACT  

Rating scales in old age psychiatry
BURNS et al.
Br. J. Psychiatry 2002;180:161-167.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Computer-Automated Dementia Screening Using a Touch-Tone Telephone
Mundt et al.
Arch Intern Med 2001;161:2481-2487.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Magnetic resonance imaging findings and postoperative neurologic dysfunction in elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting
Goto et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2001;72:137-142.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Practice parameter: Early detection of dementia: Mild cognitive impairment (an evidence-based review): Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology
Petersen et al.
Neurology 2001;56:1133-1142.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Memory Testing in Dementia: How Much Is Enough?
Derrer et al.
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2001;14:1-6.
ABSTRACT  

Clues to Early Alzheimer Dementia in the Outpatient Setting
Holzer and Warshaw
Arch Fam Med 2000;9:1066-1070.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Correlation between the Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination and Three Methods of Clock Drawing Scoring
Juby
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 1999;12:87-91.
ABSTRACT  

Methodological Pitfalls in Evaluating Clinical Tests
Mackinnon et al.
Arch Neurol 1999;56:123-124.
FULL TEXT