This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (9)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Behavioral Neurology  • Cognitive Disorders  • Epilepsy  • Seizures, Nonepileptic  • Alert me on articles by topic

William L. Bell, MD; Yong D. Park, MD; Elizabeth A. Thompson, BSN; Rodney A. Radtke, MD

Arch Neurol. 1998;55:1456-1459.

Background  Previous studies suggest that responsiveness is impaired during complex partial seizures (CPS) and pseudoseizures (PS); however, to our knowledge, there has been no systematic comparison using both response and memory testing.

Objective  To compare CPS with PS using ictal cognitive assessment (ICA) of responsiveness and memory.

Patients and Methods  We used a nonautomated method of ICA by bedside observers, consisting of family members and staff, during video electroencephalographic monitoring to test responsiveness and memory during the ictal phase in 245 events. We assessed the adequacy of testing and compared the testing results in 31 patients during CPS and 13 patients during PS.

Results  The ictal presentation of a command was successful in 58% of the events. The ictal presentation of at least 2 memory items with testing for recall after orientation was adequate in 57% of events. Impaired responsiveness was shown during both CPS and PS. However, some response was detected during 48% of PS compared with 18% of CPS (P<.01). Memory items were recalled during 63% of PS but during only 4% of CPS (P<.001). The International Classification of Epileptic Seizures remained useful, but in 11 events (8%), distinguishing complex from simple partial seizures was difficult. Recall of various types of stimuli (aural-verbal vs visual-pictorial) during ICA did not correlate with the side or location of the seizure focus, but this may have been confounded by the rarity of any memory recall during CPS.

Conclusions  Ictal cognitive assessment by bedside observers is practical and provides the interaction necessary for properly classifying seizures; ICA, especially memory, may help to distinguish CPS from PS.

From the Departments of Neurology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (Dr Bell), and Medical College of Georgia, Augusta (Dr Park), and the Division of Neurology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (Ms Thompson and Dr Radtke).

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Epilepsy: Accuracy of Patient Seizure Counts
Hoppe et al.
Arch Neurol 2007;64:1595-1599.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT