You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 55 No. 11, November 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Special Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (17)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Alzheimer Disease
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Psychiatry
 •Depression
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Clinical Research Designs for Emerging Treatments for Alzheimer Disease

Moving Beyond Placebo-Controlled Trials

David Knopman, MD; Jeffrey Kahn, PhD, MPH; Steven Miles, MD

Arch Neurol. 1998;55:1425-1429.

The design of clinical trials must evolve as new therapies become available. The demonstrated efficacy and clinical use of donepezil and vitamin E for Alzheimer disease (AD) has shifted the options for AD research design. There is now a compelling case for alternatives to trials that include a treatment arm with no active therapy (ie, a placebo control). With an existing therapy, such as donepezil or vitamin E, new drugs that are clearly superior to those drugs should be sought. Combination therapy is a likely strategy for the future, implying that clinical trials, if possible, should replicate actual practice. The long duration of future AD trials also will make placebo-controlled trials more difficult to justify and more difficult to recruit for. Add-on or active-control designs represent the alternative approaches. We believe that definitive clinical trials of new AD drugs that use one or the other of these designs would be more likely to bring about therapeutic advances than would comparisons with inactive treatments. Our argument is not a general rejection of placebo-control designs. Our recommendations apply only to the circumstances in which the field of AD drug therapy now finds itself.


From the Department of Neurology (Dr Knopman) and the Center for Bioethics (Drs Kahn and Miles), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. Dr Knopman has served as a paid consultant to Parke-Davis Pharmaceutical Research Division, Ann Arbor, Mich; Athena Neurosciences Inc, South San Francisco, Calif; Bayer Corp, West Haven, Conn; Eisai/Pfizer Inc, New York, NY; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp, East Hanover, NJ; and Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Philadelphia, Pa. He is currently conducting clinical trials with Bayer, Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals Inc, Gaithersburg, Md, and Forest Pharmaceuticals Inc, Maryland Heights, Mo. Drs Kahn and Miles have had no contacts with the pharmaceutical industry with regard to Alzheimer disease therapies.


RELATED ARTICLE

New Treatments in Alzheimer Disease and the Continued Need for Placebo-Controlled Trials
Martin R. Farlow
Arch Neurol. 1998;55(11):1396-1398.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Benefits of cognitive-motor intervention in MCI and mild to moderate Alzheimer disease
Olazaran et al.
Neurology 2004;63:2348-2353.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

DHEA for Alzheimer's disease: A modest showing by a superhormone
Knopman and Henderson
Neurology 2003;60:1060-1061.
FULL TEXT  

Alternative Neurology
Rosenberg
Arch Neurol 1998;55:1394-1395.
FULL TEXT  

New Treatments in Alzheimer Disease and the Continued Need for Placebo-Controlled Trials
Farlow
Arch Neurol 1998;55:1396-1398.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.