You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 55 No. 1, January 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (33)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
 •Neuromuscular diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Selegiline Is Ineffective in a Collaborative Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial for Treatment of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Dale J. Lange, MD; Peregrine L. Murphy, MS, MDiv; Beverly Diamond, PhD; Vicki Appel, RN; Eugene C. Lai, MD, PhD; David S. Younger, MD; Stanley H. Appel, MD

Arch Neurol. 1998;55:93-96.

Background  The cause of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is not known, and there is no effective treatment. Cell death may be caused by oxidative damage. Selegiline hydrochloride (Eldepryl) is a monoamine oxidase-B inhibitor with antioxidant properties.

Objective  To determine if selegiline affects the clinical course of patients with ALS.

Design  Six-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 133 patients with classical ALS and symptoms for less than 3 years. The primary end point to indicate effectiveness was the rate of change of the Appel ALS total score, an index of disease severity that incorporates strength and function in limbs, respiratory function, and bulbar function.

Results  Of the 133 patients, 67 were randomized to receive selegiline and 66 to receive placebo. One hundred four patients (53 in the selegiline group and 51 in the placebo group) completed the 6-month trial. Both groups were comparable for baseline characteristics and mean Appel ALS total score (70.5 points for the selegiline group and 70.6 for the placebo group). There was no difference in the rate of progression as measured by the Appel ALS total score, showing an average increase of 22 points in 6 months. The monthly rate of change was 3.4 for the selegiline group and 3.5 for the placebo group. There was 1 adverse reaction: worsening depression. Seven patients died during the study (4 in the selegiline group and 3 in the placebo group).

Conclusion  Selegiline treatment had no significant effect on the rate of clinical progression or outcome of ALS.


From the Departments of Neurology, The Neurological Institute, Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, NY (Drs Lange, Diamond, and Younger and Ms Murphy), and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (Ms Appel and Drs Lai and Appel).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Forced vital capacity (FVC) as an indicator of survival and disease progression in an ALS clinic population.
Czaplinski et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2006;77:390-392.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Novel Neuroprotectant against Retinal Ganglion Cell Damage in a Glaucoma Model and an Optic Nerve Crush Model in the Rat
Maeda et al.
IOVS 2004;45:851-856.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.