You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 54 No. 11, November 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  SPECIAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Measuring Quality of Care in Neurology

Steven P. Ringel, MD; Barbara G. Vickrey, MD, MPH

Arch Neurol. 1997;54(11):1329-1332.


Abstract

Neurologists are being asked to incorporate methods into daily practice that measure quality of care. Standards of care are increasingly being defined using evidence-based assessments of neurological literature. To evaluate quality of care, a widely accepted and useful model considers the structure, process, and outcomes of care. Outcomes, the impact of care on patients' health, should include measures of mortality, morbidity, disability, patient functioning and well-being (health-related quality of life), and patient satisfaction with care. A variety of private organizations and government programs exist to encourage documentation and promotion of high quality of care. This explosion in quality information is not yet standardized, so that much confusion exists about appropriate data elements to be measured. The challenge is to collect, summarize, and disseminate practical data useful to neurologists and the purchasers and consumers of our services.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Neurology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver (Dr Ringel), and the Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles (Dr Vickrey).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Ethical considerations for neurologists in the management of chronic pain
Neurology 2001;57:2166-2177.
FULL TEXT  

Training the future neurology workforce
Ringel et al.
Neurology 2000;54:480-480.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Managed Care in Neurorehabilitation
Idelkope and Zorowitz
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 1999;13:109-116.
ABSTRACT  

Practicing neurology: A delicate balance
Ringel
Neurology 1999;52:1526-1526.
FULL TEXT  

The Quality of Neurological Care, 1997
Rowland
Arch Neurol 1997;54:1327-1328.
ABSTRACT  

Quality of Care in Academic Neurology Departments
Barchi
Arch Neurol 1997;54:1336-1340.
ABSTRACT  

Quality of Neurological Care: Balancing Cost Control and Ethics
Bernat
Arch Neurol 1997;54:1341-1345.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.