You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 54 No. 10, October 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

The delay in reporting symptoms of carotid artery stenosis in an at-risk population. The Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study experience: a statement of concern regarding watchful waiting

J. E. Castaldo, J. J. Nelson, J. F. Reed 3rd, J. E. Longenecker and J. F. Toole
Department of Medicine, Lehigh Valley Hospital, Allentown, Pa., USA.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether patients in the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study reported symptoms of cerebral and retinal ischemia promptly to the investigating team. DESIGN: Cohort study within the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study, a prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial, with a median follow-up time of 2.7 years. SETTING: Thirty-nine clinical sites across the United States and Canada. PATIENTS: Patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (> or = 60% reduction in diameter) who experienced either a transient ischemic attack (TIA) (n = 115) or stroke (n = 127) during the follow-up period, as verified by an external committee. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Proportion of patients who reported cerebrovascular symptoms to a study nurse or physician within 3 days of occurrence. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients (32.2%) experiencing TIA and 57 (44.9%) experiencing stroke reported symptoms to the study staff within 3 days of onset. For TIA, there was a statistically significant inverse association between prompt reporting and the amount of time a patient was enrolled in the study before the event occurred (48% with TIA occurring within 6 months vs 9% with TIA after year 3; P = .04). For stroke, there was a statistically significant association between prompt reporting and treatment arm (56% for the surgical vs 38% for the medical group; P = .05). For either TIA or stroke, none of the other factors examined were significantly associated with prompt reporting. CONCLUSIONS: Despite extensive education and reinforcement, fewer than 40% of all first events were reported within 3 days and fewer than 25% were reported in less than 24 hours. Frequent outpatient evaluation of high-risk patients and careful review of symptoms is necessary to determine when asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis has become symptomatic to offer appropriate forms of therapy.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Patient Behavior Immediately After Transient Ischemic Attack According to Clinical Characteristics, Perception of the Event, and Predicted Risk of Stroke
Giles et al.
Stroke 2006;37:1254-1260.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Timing of TIAs preceding stroke: Time window for prevention is very short
Rothwell and Warlow
Neurology 2005;64:817-820.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Editorial Comment--Transient Cerebral Ischemia Demands Urgent Evaluation
Graham
Stroke 2003;34:2451-2452.
FULL TEXT  

Very Early Risk of Stroke After a First Transient Ischemic Attack
Lovett et al.
Stroke 2003;34 :e138-e140.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Is Carotid Endarterectomy Appropiate for Asymptomatic Stenosis?: Yes
Castaldo
Arch Neurol 1999;56:877-879.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.