You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 53 No. 2, February 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

The Effects of Amantadine and Pemoline on Cognitive Functioning in Multiple Sclerosis

Mark W. Geisler, PhD; Martin Sliwinski, PhD; P. K. Coyle, MD; David M. Masur, PhD; Carol Doscher, RN; Lauren B. Krupp, MD

Arch Neurol. 1996;53(2):185-188.


Abstract

Background
Amantadine hydrochloride and pemoline, both frequently used to treat the fatigue of mutiple sclerosis (MS), may also improve attention and other cognitive functions in MS. To our knowledge, these agents have never been compared in a placebo-controlled trial of patients with MS.

Objective
To evaluate the effects of amantadine and pemoline on cognitive functioning in MS.

Methods
A total of 45 ambulatory patients with MS and severe fatigue were treated for 6 weeks with amantadine, pemoline, or placebo using a parallel group design. They underwent comprehensive neuropsychological testing to determine treatment effects on cognitive functioning. Primary outcome measures were tests of attention (Digit Span, Trail Making Test, and Symbol Digit Modalities Test), verbal memory (Selective Reminding Test), nonverbal memory (Benton Visual Retention Test), and motor speed (Finger Tapping Test).

Results
Fatigue did not significantly correlate with any of the neuropsychological outcome measures at baseline or after treatment. All three treatment groups improved on tests of attention (P<.003), verbal memory (P<.001), and motor speed (P<.002). There were no significant differences between amantadine, pemoline, and placebo.

Conclusions
Cognitive functioning in MS is independent of fatigue. Neither amantadine nor pemoline enhances cognitive performance in MS compared with placebo.



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Neurology, State University of New York at Stony Brook (Drs Geisler, Coyle, and Krupp and Ms Doscher), and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (Drs Sliwinski and Masur).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Donepezil improved memory in multiple sclerosis in a randomized clinical trial
Krupp et al.
Neurology 2004;63:1579-1585.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Study and treatment of post Lyme disease (STOP-LD): A randomized double masked clinical trial
Krupp et al.
Neurology 2003;60:1923-1930.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Methylphenidate for fatigue in advanced cancer: A prospective open-label pilot study
Sarhill et al.
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CARE 2001;18:187-192.
ABSTRACT  

Fatigue and declines in cognitive functioning in multiple sclerosis
Krupp and Elkins
Neurology 2000;55:934-939.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Modalities of fatigue in multiple sclerosis: correlation with clinical and biological factors
lriarte et al.
Mult Scler 2000;6:124-130.
ABSTRACT  

Fatigue in multiple sclerosis: relationship to depression, disability, and disease pattern
Kroencke et al.
Mult Scler 2000;6:131-136.
ABSTRACT  

Recent developments in drug therapy for multiple sclerosis
Smith and Darlington
Mult Scler 1999;5:110-120.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.