You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 53 No. 11, November 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (94)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Vagus Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Medically Intractable Seizures

Results of a 1-Year Open-Extension Trial

Martin C. Salinsky, MD; Basim M. Uthman, MD; Ruzica K. Ristanovic, MD; J. F. Wernicke, MD; W. Brent Tarver, MS; Vagus Nerve Stimulation Study Group

Arch Neurol. 1996;53(11):1176-1180.


Abstract



Background
Chronic vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) continues to be evaluated as an adjunctive treatment for medically intractable seizures. A previous randomized controlled trial of 114 patients demonstrated a significant decrease in seizure frequency during 3 months of VNS at effective stimulation levels.

Objective
To evaluate the efficacy of 1 year of VNS therapy for the treatment of medically refractory partial seizures and the relationship between initial and longterm response.

Patients and Methods
All patients exiting the randomized controlled study of VNS for treatment of medically refractory partial seizures were offered indefinite treatment extension as part of an open-label trial. One hundred (88%) of 114 patients completed 12 months of VNS treatment at effective stimulation levels. Fourteen patients discontinued VNS treatment prior to 1 year, principally because of the treatment's lack of efficacy. These 14 patients were retained in the present analysis using an intent-to-treat approach. Antiepileptic drug use was monitored throughout the trial. Seizure frequency was analyzed in 4 sequential 3-month treatment periods.

Results
Compared with pretreatment baseline, there was a significant decrease in seizure frequency during each of the 3-month treatment periods. Seizure frequency was reduced by a median of 20% during the first 3 months of VNS treatment and by 32% during stimulation months 10 through 12. Response during the first 3 months of VNS treatment was a statistically significant predictor of response at months 10 through 12. The observed reduction in seizure frequency was not explained by overall changes in antiepileptic drug use.

Conclusions
The results indicate that VNS remains an effective adjunctive therapy for medically refractory partial seizures over a period of at least 1 year. Response during the first 3 months of treatment is predictive of longterm response.



Author Affiliations



From the Oregon Health Sciences University Epilepsy Center, Portland (Dr Salinsky); Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville (Dr Uthman); Department of Neurology, Rush-Presbyterian-St Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, Ill (Dr Ristanovic); and Cyberonics Inc, Webster, Tex (Dr Wernicke and Mr Tarver). A complete list of members of the Vagus Nerve Stimulation Study Group appears on page 1180.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Effectiveness of vagus nerve stimulation in epilepsy patients: A 12-year observation
Uthman et al.
Neurology 2004;63:1124-1126.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The effect of electrical dental equipment on a vagus nerve stimulator's function
ROBERTS
Journal of the American Dental Association 2002;133:1657-1664.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Therapeutic mechanisms of vagus nerve stimulation
Henry
Neurology 2002;59:S3-14.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Vagus nerve stimulation therapy summary: Five years after FDA approval
Schachter
Neurology 2002;59:S15-29.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The co-morbidity of depression and epilepsy: Epidemiology, etiology, and treatment
Harden
Neurology 2002;59:S48-55.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Vagus Nerve Stimulation Treatment for Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome
Hosain et al.
J Child Neurol 2000;15:509-512.
ABSTRACT  

Long-term treatment with vagus nerve stimulation in patients with refractory epilepsy
Morris and Mueller
Neurology 1999;53:1731-1731.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reassessment: Vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy: A Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology
Fisher and Handforth
Neurology 1999;53:666-666.
FULL TEXT  

Acute blood flow changes and efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation in partial epilepsy
Henry et al.
Neurology 1999;52:1166-1166.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.