You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 53 No. 10, October 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Diagnosis of Dementia

Methods for Interpretation of Scores of 5 Neuropsychological Tests

Nachshon Meiran, PhD; Donald T. Stuss, PhD; D. Antonio Guzman, MD; Ginette Lafleche, PhD; Jonathan Willmer, MD

Arch Neurol. 1996;53(10):1043-1054.


Abstract

Objective
To provide methods to interpret and compare different neurobehavioral screening tests for the diagnosis of dementia.

Design
Five mental-status neuropsychological tools for dementia screening were administered to patients in a memory disorder clinic. These included the Mini-Mental State Examination, the Dementia Rating Scale, the 6-item derivative of the Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test, a short Mental Status Questionnaire, and a composite tool we labeled the Ottawa Mental Status Examination, which assessed orientation, memory, attention, language, and visual-constructive functioning.

Results
To obtain z and percentile scores, norms are for the different tests, computed separately for patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type, vascular dementia, or no dementia. Another set of norms is reported in which a test score is translated directly into the posttest probability of dementia. Translation formulas are given to allow the estimation of the score on one test from the result on another test.

Conclusion
The interpretation of tests used to diagnose dementia must be based on an understanding of the meaning of an individual score, which is based on the question asked and the population to which the patient is referenced.



Author Affiliations

From the Rotman Research Institute of Baycrest Centre (Drs Meiran and Stuss) and the Departments of Medicine (Neurology) and Psychology (Dr Stuss), University of Toronto, Ontario; the Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of Ottawa, Ontario (Drs Stuss, Guzman, and Willmer); the Memory Disorder Clinic, Elizabeth Bruyere Health Centre, Ottawa (Drs Guzman and Willmer); and the Department of Neuropsychology, New England Sinai Hospital and Rehabilitation Center, Stoughton, Mass (Dr Lafleche).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Memory Testing in Dementia: How Much Is Enough?
Derrer et al.
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2001;14:1-6.
ABSTRACT  

Donepezil (Aricept(R)) treatment of multi infarct dementia: The caregivers and clinical impression
Shua-Haim et al.
AM J ALZHEIMERS DIS OTHER DEMEN 2000;15:201-211.
ABSTRACT  

Differentiation of vascular dementia from AD on neuropsychological tests
Looi and Sachdev
Neurology 1999;53:670-670.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Screening for dementia with the Memory Impairment Screen
Buschke et al.
Neurology 1999;52:231-231.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Do Long Tests Yield a More Accurate Diagnosis of Dementia Than Short Tests? A Comparison of 5 Neuropsychological Tests
Stuss et al.
Arch Neurol 1996;53:1033-1039.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.