You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 52 No. 9, September 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Neuro-ophthalmic Features of Cerebral Venous Obstruction

Valerie A. Purvin, MD; Jonathan D. Trobe, MD; Gregory Kosmorsky, DO

Arch Neurol. 1995;52(9):880-885.


Abstract

Objective
To characterize the neuro-ophthalmologic manifestations of impaired cranial venous outflow.

Design
A retrospective study of 20 patients who developed increased intracranial pressure as the result of impaired cerebral drainage.

Setting

Three neuro-ophthalmologic referral centers.

Patients
Ten patients had noncompressive thrombosis of sagittal or lateral sinuses (noncompressive group), four had compression of the sagittal sinus or jugular veins (compressive group), and six had transient sinus thrombosis following surgical procedures (iatrogenic group).

Interventions
Medical and/or surgical treatment of increased intracranial pressure and of underlying conditions predisposing to venous obstruction.

Main Outcome Measures
Symptoms (headache and esodeviation) and signs (visual acuity, visual fields, and optic disc appearance) of increased intracranial pressure.

Results
Headache was more severe, esodeviation was more prevalent, and onset was more abrupt in the noncompressive group than in the compressive and iatrogenic groups. Among the 10 patients with noncompressive thrombosis, factors predisposing to thrombosis were present in seven patients but sometimes overlooked. Following treatment, visual outcome was generally favorable in all three groups. All patients had 20/30 or better visual acuity in at least one eye, and substantial visual field loss was present in both eyes of only two patients.

Conclusions
The clinical manifestation of impaired cerebral venous outflow vary depending on the underlying mechanism. Although most patients maintain good vision, more aggressive treatment is sometimes indicated in patients with thrombosis or compression. The abrupt onset and marked severity of symptoms in patients with thrombosis should help to differentiate these patients from those with idiopathic intracranial hypertension.



Author Affiliations

From the Midwest Eye Institute/Methodist Hospital and the Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis (Dr Purvin); Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (Dr Trobe); and the Department of Ophthalmology, Cleveland (Ohio) Clinic (Dr Kosmorsky).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Diagnostic criteria for idiopathic intracranial hypertension
Friedman and Jacobson
Neurology 2002;59:1492-1495.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cerebral venous thrombosis presenting as acute visual loss
KO et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:1139b-1139.
FULL TEXT  

Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension in Children
Youroukos et al.
J Child Neurol 2000;15:453-457.
ABSTRACT  

Blind Drive
Lee
Arch Neurol 1996;53:401-401.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.