You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 52 No. 8, August 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Measuring Patient-Centered Outcomes in Neurologic Disease

Extending the Q-TWiST Method

Carolyn E. Schwartz, ScD; Bernard F. Cole, PhD; Richard D. Gelber, PhD

Arch Neurol. 1995;52(8):754-762.


Abstract

Background
Current clinical research and outcomes assessment on multiple sclerosis rely on an approach to disability measurement that is heavily influenced by ambulation. Not only is this strategy often insensitive to the clinical changes affected by pharmacotherapeutic or rehabilitative interventions but it also disregards the symptoms that patients seem to consider most enervating. We propose a new method for evaluating clinical interventions in terms of their impact on the symptoms of multiple sclerosis, side effects, parameters of exacerbation, and disease progression, while considering the patient's perspective.

Methods
The extended Q-TWiST method yields an estimation of treatment trade-offs in terms of Quality-adjusted Time Without Symptoms and Toxicities (Q-TWiST). An illustration of this method is presented by using a hypothetical clinical trial of two treatments. The trade-offs between the two treatments are highlighted to facilitate treatment decision making by using individual patient importance weights.

Conclusion
We discuss applications to other clinical research and other chronic diseases.



Author Affiliations

From Frontier Science and Technology Research Foundation Inc, Brookline, Mass, and the Rocky Mountain Multiple Sclerosis Center, Englewood, Colo (Dr Schwartz); the Department of Community Health and Division of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, Providence, RI (Dr Cole); and the Division of Biostatistics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass (Dr Gelber).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Autologous HSCT for severe progressive multiple sclerosis in a multicenter trial: impact on disease activity and quality of life
Saccardi et al.
Blood 2005;105:2601-2607.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality of Life and Its Relationship to Brain Lesions and Atrophy on Magnetic Resonance Images in 60 Patients With Multiple Sclerosis
Janardhan and Bakshi
Arch Neurol 2000;57:1485-1491.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Recent developments in the assessment of quality of life in Multiple Sclerosis (MS)
Fischer et al.
Mult Scler 1999;5:251-259.
ABSTRACT  

New Treatment Strategies for Malignant Gliomas
Avgeropoulos and Batchelor
The Oncologist 1999;4:209-224.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reliability and validity of two self-report measures of impairment and disability for MS
Schwartz et al.
Neurology 1999;52:63-63.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Quality-of-Life Effects of Interferon Beta-1b in Multiple Sclerosis: An Extended Q-TWiST Analysis
Schwartz et al.
Arch Neurol 1997;54:1475-1480.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.