You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 52 No. 10, October 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Neuropsychologic Predictors of Competency in Alzheimer's Disease Using a Rational Reasons Legal Standard

Daniel C. Marson, JD, PhD; Heather A. Cody; Kellie K. Ingram; Lindy E. Harrell, MD, PhD

Arch Neurol. 1995;52(10):955-959.


Abstract

Objective
To identify neuropsychologic predictors of competency performance and status in Alzheimer's disease (AD) using a specific legal standard (LS). This study is a follow-up to the competency assessment research reported in this issue of the ARCHIVES.

Design
Univariate and multivariate analyses of independent neuropsychologic test measures with a dependent measure of competency to consent to treatment.

Setting
University medical center.

Subjects
Fifteen normal older control subjects and 29 patients with probable AD.

Main Outcome Measures
Subjects were administered a battery of neuropsychologic measures theoretically linked to competency function, as well as two clinical vignettes testing their capacity to consent to medical treatment under five different LSs. The present study focused on one specific LS: the capacity to provide "rational reasons" for a treatment choice (LS4). Neuropsychologic test scores were correlated with scores on LS4 for the normal control group and the AD group. The resulting univariate predictors were then analyzed using stepwise regression and discriminant function to identify the key multivariate predictors of competency performance and status under LS4.

Results
Measures of word fluency predicted the LS4 scores of controls (R2=.33) and the AD group (R2=.36). A word fluency measure also emerged as the best single predictor of competency status for the full subject sample (n=44), correctly classifying 82% of cases. Dementia severity (Mini-Mental State Examination score) did not emerge as a multivariate predictor of competency performance or status. Interestingly, measures of verbal reasoning and memory were not strongly associated with LS4.

Conclusions
Word fluency measures predicted the normative performance and intact competency status of older control subjects and the declining performance and compromised competency status of patients with AD on a "rational reasons" standard of competency to consent to treatment. Cognitive capacities related to frontal lobe function appear to underlie the capacity to formulate rational reasons for a treatment choice. Neuropsychologic studies of competency function have important theoretical and clinical value.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Neurology and the Alzheimer's Disease Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Assessment of Decision-Making Capacity in Older Adults: An Emerging Area of Practice and Research
Moye and Marson
Focus 2009;7:88-97.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Cognitive Correlates of Functional Status: A Review From the Committee on Research of the American Neuropsychiatric Association
Royall et al.
J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosi. 2007;19:249-265.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessment of Decision-Making Capacity in Older Adults: An Emerging Area of Practice and Research
Moye and Marson
Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Science 2007;62:P3-P11.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessing Decisional Capacity for Clinical Research or Treatment: A Review of Instruments
Dunn et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2006;163:1323-1334.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cognitive performance predicts treatment decisional abilities in mild to moderate dementia
Gurrera et al.
Neurology 2006;66:1367-1372.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Impact of Medical Illness on Executive Function
Schillerstrom et al.
Psychosomatics 2005;46:508-516.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Subtle ethical dilemmas in geriatric management and clinical research
Rosin and van Dijk
J. Med. Ethics 2005;31:355-359.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Understanding of informed consent by demented individuals
Buckles et al.
Neurology 2003;61:1662-1666.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Informed Consent and the Capacity for Voluntarism
Roberts
Focus 2003;1:407-414.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Doctors' knowledge about consent and capacity
Ahern
JRSM 2003;96:257-257.
FULL TEXT  

'Not in perfect mind' -- the complexity of clinical capacity assessment
Raymont
Psychiatr. Bull. 2002;26:201-204.
FULL TEXT  

Informed Consent and the Capacity for Voluntarism
Roberts
Am. J. Psychiatry 2002;159:705-712.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Treating Nondementia Illnesses in Patients With Dementia
Brauner et al.
JAMA 2000;283:3230-3235.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Competency to consent to medical treatment in cognitively impaired patients with Parkinson's disease
Dymek et al.
Neurology 2000;56:17-24.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Attention: Neuropsychological Predictor of Competency in Alzheimer's Disease
Bassett
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 1999;12:200-205.
ABSTRACT  

Assessing Competency in Dementia
JWatch Psychiatry 1995;1995:4-4.
FULL TEXT  

Assessing the Competency of Patients With Alzheimer's Disease Under Different Legal Standards: A Prototype Instrument
Marson et al.
Arch Neurol 1995;52:949-954.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.