This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

A Prototype Instrument

Daniel C. Marson, JD, PhD; Kellie K. Ingram; Heather A. Cody; Lindy E. Harrell, MD, PhD

Arch Neurol. 1995;52(10):949-954.

Abstract
Objective
To assess empirically the competency of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) to consent to medical treatment under different legal standards (LSs).

Design
Comparison of normal older subjects and patients with AD on measures of competency to consent to medical treatment.

Setting
University medical center.

Subjects
Normal older control subjects (n=15) and patients with probable AD (n=29 [15 with mild and 14 with moderate AD]).

Main Outcome Measures
Two specialized clinical vignettes were developed that test a subject's capacity to consent to medical treatment under five wellestablished LSs for this competency: LS1, evidencing treatment choice; LS2, making the reasonable choice; LS3, appreciating consequences of choice; LS4, providing rational reasons for choice; and LS5, understanding treatment situation and choices. Performance on the LSs was compared across control and AD groups using Student's t test, X², and analysis of variance. Demented subjects were categorized as competent, marginally competent, or incompetent under each LS by using a cutoff score derived from normal control performance.

Results
No differences between groups emerged for LS1 and LS2. Control subjects performed significantly better than patients with mild AD on LS4 and LS5, and significantly better than patients with moderate AD on LS3, LS4, and LS5. Patients with mild AD performed significantly better than patients with moderate AD on LS4 and LS5. With respect to competency status, patients with AD showed a consistent and progressive pattern of compromise (marginal competence or incompetence) related to dementia severity and stringency of the LS.

Conclusions
A reliable prototype instrument validly discriminated the competency performance and classified the competency status of control subjects and patients with mild and moderate AD under five LSs for competency to consent to medical treatment. While the groups performed equivalently on minimal standards requiring merely a treatment choice (LS1) or the reasonable treatment choice (LS2), patients with mild AD had difficulty with more difficult standards requiring rational reasons (LS4) and understanding treatment information (LS5), and patients with moderate AD had difficulty with appreciation of consequences (LS3), rational reasons (LS4), and understanding treatment (LS5). The results raised the concern that many patients with mild AD may not be competent to consent to treatment and supported the value of standardized clinical vignettes for assessment of competency in dementia.

Author Affiliations
From the Department of Neurology and Alzheimer's Disease Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Clinical Utility of the Hopkins Competency Assessment Test on an Inpatient Geropsychiatry Unit
Wilkins et al.
AM J ALZHEIMERS DIS OTHER DEMEN 2009;24:34-39.
ABSTRACT  

Surrogate consent for dementia research: A national survey of older Americans
Kim et al.
Neurology 2009;72:149-155.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessment of Decision-Making Capacity in Older Adults: An Emerging Area of Practice and Research
Moye and Marson
Focus 2009;7:88-97.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Medical decision-making capacity in mild cognitive impairment: A 3-year longitudinal study
Okonkwo et al.
Neurology 2008;71:1474-1480.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Medical decision-making capacity in patients with mild cognitive impairment
Okonkwo et al.
Neurology 2007;69:1528-1535.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Cognitive Correlates of Functional Status: A Review From the Committee on Research of the American Neuropsychiatric Association
Royall et al.
J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosi. 2007;19:249-265.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Determining when impairment constitutes incapacity for informed consent in schizophrenia research
Kim et al.
Br. J. Psychiatry 2007;191:38-43.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Consent for Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Stroke: Review and Future Directions
White-Bateman et al.
Arch Neurol 2007;64:785-792.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Health care decision-making of persons with dementia
Horton-Deutsch et al.
Dementia 2007;6:105-120.
ABSTRACT  

Reliability and Validity of the Evaluation to Sign Consent Measure
Resnick et al.
Gerontologist 2007;47:69-77.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessment of Decision-Making Capacity in Older Adults: An Emerging Area of Practice and Research
Moye and Marson
Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Science 2007;62:P3-P11.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Competency for Creation, Use, and Revocation of Psychiatric Advance Directives
Srebnik and Kim
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 2006;34:501-510.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Do Clinicians Follow a Risk-Sensitive Model of Capacity-Determination? An Experimental Video Survey
Kim et al.
Psychosomatics 2006;47:325-329.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessing Decisional Capacity for Clinical Research or Treatment: A Review of Instruments
Dunn et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2006;163:1323-1334.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cognitive performance predicts treatment decisional abilities in mild to moderate dementia
Gurrera et al.
Neurology 2006;66:1367-1372.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Medical decision-making in neurodegenerative disease: Mild AD and PD with cognitive impairment
Griffith et al.
Neurology 2005;65:483-485.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Subtle ethical dilemmas in geriatric management and clinical research
Rosin and van Dijk
J. Med. Ethics 2005;31:355-359.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The ability of persons with Alzheimer disease (AD) to make a decision about taking an AD treatment
Karlawish et al.
Neurology 2005;64:1514-1519.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Mental capacity, legal competence and consent to treatment
Buchanan
JRSM 2004;97:415-420.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

How Does an Alzheimer's Disease Patient's Role in Medical Decision Making Change Over Time?
Hirschman et al.
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2004;17:55-60.
ABSTRACT  

Capacity to Consent to Treatment: Empirical Comparison of Three Instruments in Older Adults With and Without Dementia
Moye et al.
Gerontologist 2004;44:166-175.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Who Can Stay at Home?: Assessing the Capacity to Choose to Live in the Community
Cooney et al.
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:357-360.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Understanding of informed consent by demented individuals
Buckles et al.
Neurology 2003;61:1662-1666.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Advance Care Planning in Nursing Homes: Correlates of Capacity and Possession of Advance Directives
Allen et al.
Gerontologist 2003;43:309-317.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Doctors' knowledge about consent and capacity
Ahern
JRSM 2003;96:257-257.
FULL TEXT  

Utility and Limits of the Mini Mental State Examination in Evaluating Consent Capacity in Alzheimer's Disease
Kim and Caine
Psychiatr. Serv. 2002;53:1322-1324.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relationship between Alzheimer's Disease Severity and Patient Participation in Decisions about Their Medical Care
Karlawish et al.
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2002;15:68-72.
ABSTRACT  

Impaired Decision-Making Ability in Subjects With Alzheimer's Disease and Willingness to Participate in Research
Kim et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2002;159:797-802.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Do persons with dementia vote?
Karlawish et al.
Neurology 2002;58:1100-1102.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Competency to consent to medical treatment in cognitively impaired patients with Parkinson's disease
Cranston et al.
Neurology 2001;56:1782-1783.
FULL TEXT  

Practice parameter: Management of dementia (an evidence-based review): Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology
Doody et al.
Neurology 2001;56:1154-1166.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessing the Competence of Persons With Alzheimer's Disease in Providing Informed Consent for Participation in Research
Kim et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2001;158:712-717.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessing Financial Capacity in Patients With Alzheimer Disease: A Conceptual Model and Prototype Instrument
Marson et al.
Arch Neurol 2000;57:877-884.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Competency to consent to medical treatment in cognitively impaired patients with Parkinson's disease
Dymek et al.
Neurology 2000;56:17-24.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Attention: Neuropsychological Predictor of Competency in Alzheimer's Disease
Bassett
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 1999;12:200-205.
ABSTRACT  

Error behaviors associated with loss of competency in Alzheimer's disease
Marson et al.
Neurology 1999;53:1983-1983.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Decision-Making Capacity-Reply
Marson and Harrell
Arch Neurol 1996;53:589-590.
ABSTRACT  

Assessing Competency in Dementia
JWatch Psychiatry 1995;1995:4-4.
FULL TEXT  

Neuropsychologic Predictors of Competency in Alzheimer's Disease Using a Rational Reasons Legal Standard
Marson et al.
Arch Neurol 1995;52:955-959.
ABSTRACT