
Risk of Hypotension During Apnea Testing
Joseph S. Jeret, MD;
Jeffrey L. Benjamin, MD
Arch Neurol. 1994;51(6):595-599.
Abstract
Objective To determine the safety of apnea testing.
Design Prospective, consecutive study.
Setting Inner-city trauma center.
Patients A total of 70 apnea tests were performed on 61 comatose patients as part of the determination of brain death.
Results Only 43 examinations (61%) were well tolerated. During 27 examinations (39%) patients either developed marked hypotension ( 15% drop in mean arterial pressure) (n=23) or required prophylactic vasopressor manipulation (n=4). Of the 27 examinations in which hypotension developed, 14 were aborted, two were tolerated despite marked hypotension, four were tolerated after administration of prophylactic epinephrine (n=1) or dopamine hydrochloride (n=3), seven were successfully completed after increases in the rate of dopamine infusion during the test.
Conclusions Hypotension can pose a significant risk to patients undergoing apnea testing. Constant monitoring of vital signs throughout the test is essential to its safe completion.
Author Affiliations
From the Department of Neurology, State University of New York Health Science Center at Brooklyn. Dr Jeret is now in private practice in Rockville Centre, NY.
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
PRONOUNCING BRAIN DEATH: CONTEMPORARY PRACTICE AND SAFETY OF THE APNEA TEST
Jeret and Wijdicks
Neurology 2009;73:159-160.
FULL TEXT
Complications during apnea testing in the determination of brain death: Predisposing factors
Jeret et al.
Neurology 2001;56:1249-1249.
FULL TEXT
Complications during apnea testing in the determination of brain death: Predisposing factors
Goudreau et al.
Neurology 2000;55:1045-1048.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
In Search of a Safe Apnea Test in Brain Death: Is the Procedure Really More Dangerous Than We Think?
Wijdicks
Arch Neurol 1995;52:338-338.
ABSTRACT
In Search of a Safe Apnea Test in Brain Death: Is the Procedure Really More Dangerous Than We Think?-Reply
Jeret and Benjamin
Arch Neurol 1995;52:338-339.
ABSTRACT
|