You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 51 No. 5, May 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Brain Potentials Reveal Deficits of Language Processing After Closed Head Injury

Thomas F. Münte, MD; Hans-Jochen Heinze, MD

Arch Neurol. 1994;51(5):482-493.


Abstract

Objective
To delineate deficits in language processing after closed head injury with use of behavioral measures and event-related brain potentials.

Design
Case-control design. All subjects participated in three verbal event-related brain potential experiments, and the resulting measures were compared both within and between groups.

Patients/Controls
Eleven patients at least 2 years after severe closed head injury (Glasgow Coma Scale score <8 at admission and duration of posttraumatic amnesia >48 hours) were compared with a control group matched for age and educational level.

Interventions
None.

Main Outcome Measures
Reaction times and percentage correct as behavioral measures in the three experiments (sentence verification, semantic and repetition priming with lexical decision task, and continuous word recognition). Event-related brain potentials were quantified by area measures in successive time windows for the different experimental conditions and for different experiments.

Results
The reaction times of the patient group were significantly longer than those of the controls (P<.005). Similarly, the patients' accuracy was significantly worse in all experiments (P<.03). The event-related brain potentials of the controls showed a clear and significant reduction of a negative component (N400) to terminal words of true sentences (sentence verification experiment),semantically primedwords and repeated words (lexical decision experiment), and recognized words (continuous word recognition). For the patients, a clear N400 effect was seen only in the sentence verification task (delayed by about 100 milliseconds), while only later event-related brain potential modulations were seen in the other tasks.

Conclusion
Language functions are disturbed after closed head injury. The electrophysiologic data suggest difficulties in the integration of incoming linguistic stimuli with the previous context as a possible underlying cause.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Neurology, Medical School of Hanover, Hanover, Germany.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

An Electrophysiological Analysis of Altered Cognitive Functions in Huntington Disease
Munte et al.
Arch Neurol 1997;54:1089-1098.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.